Need advice: static imploding because of cheater.

[Saraide]

Do people just knowingly bite the bait just because they're bored?

That's literally every thread.

[LianaThorne]

Try Stan or Binge, they have a lot of the NCIS series. I miss Lucifer

Oooh, thank you for the recommendations. Need some new shows to watch while I suffer for the Pteranodon.

[RobynDaBank]

Do I really need to write it into rules "don't cheat"?

Yep, you do. Because when interacting with others in the static-finding/recruiting community, you'll find that callout AddOns or the like are "normalized". That's why it's the norm to use them/not care if someone is using them, and unusual to ban their use. Parsers and logging are must-haves in the raiding community for instance.

[ZephyrMenodora]

Did the right thing. If your static wants to keep a cheater because they benefit from having a cheater for easier clears, good riddance.

Anyone who thinks you needed to have a group discussion fto decide whether you can remove someone who streams cheating is strange to me. A message explaining why the decision was made was enough.

Your better off in the long run without the cheater or cheater sympathizers who’d rather keep a cheater than be inconvenienced.

[SweetestLily]

I think you could have pulled him to the side and asked him cease and to delete that vod. A simple conversation can work miracles. Now other people will probably be wary to raid with you as you have now been labeled a snitch.

[ZephyrMenodora]

I think you could have pulled him to the side and asked him cease and to delete that vod. A simple conversation can work miracles. Now other people will probably be wary to raid with you as you have now been labeled a snitch.

Sounds like a group of trash players who cheat. Good riddance lol

[NekoMataMata]

I think you could have pulled him to the side and asked him cease and to delete that vod. A simple conversation can work miracles. Now other people will probably be wary to raid with you as you have now been labeled a snitch.

Or at the very least, label them problematic and incapable of solving issues without creating drama. Seriously, how awkward can you get? No one wants someone like that on their team, much less at the leader of their static.

The whole discussion around 3pp here is just a symptom of the greater issue: OP's inability to lead and solve issues as leader of a group without creating a mess.

[ZephyrMenodora]

Or at the very least, label them problematic and incapable of solving issues without creating drama. Seriously, how awkward can you get? No one wants someone like that on their team, much less at the leader of their static.

The whole discussion around 3pp here is just a symptom of the greater issue: OP's inability to lead and solve issues as leader of a group without creating a mess.

lol. Removing a streaming cheater is something a leader should do and solved the issue. A group discussion shouldn’t change that decision. Such weird takes I’m this thread. I wonder if people act this dense just to be contrarian or argue.

Being a leader is doing the right thing. Even when it’s inconvenient. Sounds like the other players just wanted easy clears with a cheater.

[NekoMataMata]

lol. Removing a streaming cheater is something a leader should do and solved the issue. A group discussion shouldn’t change that decision. Such weird takes I’m this thread. I wonder if people act this dense just to be contrarian or argue.

Being a leader is doing the right thing. Even when it’s inconvenient. Sounds like the other players just wanted easy clears with a cheater.

How to tell that someone has no life and no social skills, all right here in one convenient post.

[ZephyrMenodora]

How to tell that someone has no life and no social skills, all right here in one convenient post.

Weird. I am the business owner of a multimillion dollar small business that relies on social skills. I’ve been married for 16 years and am active in my local community.

But of course a cheater sympathizer would type something like this.