I am so, so tired...

[LordSunny]

I mean considering that it's a personal house, which gives nothing whatsoever, it's obviously for decoration, which there is nothing wrong with ?

Why judge ?

Why does everything have to be about profit all the time ? Cant someone just enjoy something without gaining money from it ?

Maybe because every other thread on this forum is a complaint about the lack of housing. It's almost, almost like it's relevant... Maybe if I squint hard enough.

[Stormpeaks]

Maybe because every other thread on this forum is a complaint about the lack of housing. It's almost, almost like it's relevant... Maybe if I squint hard enough.

You are on Maduin which is one of the many new worlds, there is more than enough housing available there.

Also it's not up to you to decide if people want to buy 25 accounts and get 25 houses, what people do with their money is none of your business.

[CatStarwind]

Also it's not up to you to decide if people want to buy 25 accounts and get 25 houses, what people do with their money is none of your business.

If it affects the community at large, then it quite literally is the communities business. You can't play an MMO and expect to do so in a bubble.

[ZiraZ]

You are on Maduin which is one of the many new worlds, there is more than enough housing available there.

Also it's not up to you to decide if people want to buy 25 accounts and get 25 houses, what people do with their money is none of your business.

This is still an MMO, we can give SE feedback to change the rules and stop allowing that for future wards so more unique individuals can get a chance at a house, along with closing other loopholes.
Just like how they changed the house limit per account rule in the past.
Again, nobody is naming names or making a call to arms or "judging", but some of you are so quick to get uppity about any type of comment giving feedback or in this case just simply asking a question lmao.

[Stormpeaks]

This is still an MMO, we can give SE feedback to change the rules and stop allowing that for future wards so more unique individuals can get a chance at a house, along with closing other loopholes.
Just like how they changed the house limit per account rule in the past.
Again, nobody is naming names or making a call to arms or "judging", but some of you are so quick to get uppity about any type of comment giving feedback or in this case just simply asking a question lmao.

How is it a loophole ? The person clearly stated that the person took the plots as PERSONAL which means its from 7 different accounts.

This is not a loophole, it works just as intended, one personal per account.

There is no way to "play" or "bypass" the one personal house per account per world rule, absolutely none.

If you see a problem with someone using 7 accounts to get more houses, I dont know what to tell you, some people collect cars, some people collect old coins, some people collect old bottles of coca-cola, or some even collect rocks, what people do with their money is their problem, and it shouldnt be yours or mine

People can play for whatever reasons they have.

That goes likewise for people with multiple houses, people do what they want with their game.

Rich people exist, and for rich people the cost of 7 subs is insignificant, compared to the bragging rights.

It's a similar situation to whales on mobile titles, who drop thousands just to be top of some leaderboard.

Always assume stupidity over malice, and there's nobody more stupid than rich people who don't know the value of money.

Their money is theirs to use, if they decide to buy 100 accounts and to take over 2 entire wards or close to it, it's their problem, its not a loophole, they are buying new accounts which means Square is swimming in cash from these people.

If they're paying for 7 subscriptions, it's within the rules. Since each service account can have 1 personal house on a server.

This.

[LordSunny]

You are on Maduin which is one of the many new worlds, there is more than enough housing available there.

Also it's not up to you to decide if people want to buy 25 accounts and get 25 houses, what people do with their money is none of your business.

I disagree - when you have countless people within a community with a complaint about the lack of housing (again, this isn't exclusive to just Maduin, so your point doesn't much stand), then it becomes everyones problem.

[Yodada]

I disagree - when you have countless people within a community with a complaint about the lack of housing (again, this isn't exclusive to just Maduin, so your point doesn't much stand), then it becomes everyones problem.

Problem is that those complaints are coming from people of over populated worlds and which are naive enough to think that throwing more servers for housing on those worlds would be the solution. Lets be honest here instanced housing wont come at least for FF14, the past decision from Square are clearly showing that this is not a solution they are considering. Of course Square is going to add only new worlds instead of even more ward server capacity to current worlds. They are a business and thinking of the future when this game hasnt the sub numbers they are having now. Then its easier to close and running just several smaller Worlds with less fixed costs instead of running a smaller count of those large server structure in the background with larger fixed costs that they cant close because the gave in to the Balmungian entitlement of having 100 Wards for the Brothel district?

[TwistedTea]

Maybe because every other thread on this forum is a complaint about the lack of housing. It's almost, almost like it's relevant... Maybe if I squint hard enough.

If they're paying for 7 subscriptions, it's within the rules. Since each service account can have 1 personal house on a server.

[LordSunny]

If they're paying for 7 subscriptions, it's within the rules. Since each service account can have 1 personal house on a server.

I don't disagree that it's within the rules.

I'm implying that given that the forums are absolutely littered with people that have a complaint about the given housing situation ( and before I get reamed again - NOT JUST ON MADUIN :F ) that obviously there should be a better way of tracking/maintaining it so that it isn't allowable.
How that looks, I don't know. I'm neither an engineer or developer and SE is not an indie company that cannot afford to figure out better solutions.

The problem is a thorn to most of the player base that isn't looped into these forums or those that haven't spoken up here ( Because again, they absolutely get ripped apart for not being a Forum veteran posting an opinion ).

[TwistedTea]

I don't disagree that it's within the rules.
I'm implying that given that the forums are absolutely littered with people that have a complaint about the given housing situation ( and before I get reamed again - NOT JUST ON MADUIN :F ) that obviously there should be a better way of tracking/maintaining it so that it isn't allowable.

I've been advocating for fully instanced housing for years while keep the existing ward housing. Fully instanced housing should be available for every player. Players who want a exclusive/flex house or whatever can fight it out for ward houses.

But what are you actually saying, by someone having multiple service accounts to own multiple houses, should not be allowed?

Why would SE, a for profit company, shaft the whales who are willing to pay for multiple subscriptions?