Quote Originally Posted by Atelier-Bagur View Post
Yeah or it just leaves wiggle room for the player to formulate their own assumptions like our Crystarium Vii, possibly being a Voeburtite, with her name. The clan thing I think isnt set in stone, since you also see that happen with the Hellsguard and Sea Wolf clans where you have some Hellsguard going with traditional sea wolf names rather than sticking to their own conventions and vice versa.

And it just goes to show that just like in real life, people arent bound by native race for expressing themselves anyway.
o,o okay? I'm not saying that wouldn't be the case.

On one hand, you're right, and that's kind of what everyone else is doing, that is the conversation at hand and I am paying attention to it.

On the other hand, considering this isn't real life, but rather a fantasy world with specific rules which very rare characters tend to break, it's really unlikely. One who does very much establish itself as a World of Hats as a base.

And if you've been paying attention to the conversation, it's already been stated that the Viis (btw, someone else also told you it's Viis, singular and plural) are long-lived people. It's possible that she has outlived the 100 years since the Flood of Light. However, we know nothing of her past, so any conclusion can be drawn and it'd be equally valid. Provided it respected what we do know.

Until further context is provided, and considering this is a world whose story is written rather than evolving organically, one that has had inconsistencies before, I'll keep the most likely scenario that it's just a simple error. It's not an "or" scenario, Atelier. You're free to think however you want about it. I'm just pointing out: it's possible it's a fluke, and people are going in circles trying to justify it.

Otherwise, yeah, I'm not trying to disprove what you guys are saying. Not intentionally at least. If I were to do the same mental exercise you guys are doing, which I have while reading, I'd have nothing to add that hasn't already been said.

TLDR: "Don't forget a more Doylist answer to this is possible. Otherwise, I'm fully content observing your dialogue which revolves around a Watsonian perspective."