Quote Originally Posted by Saraide View Post
Did I say you care about as few people as possible having the reward? If so please point me to it and I will correct it.
Quote Originally Posted by Saraide View Post
According to you logic of "it's my turn on the controller now" you would lose your top 100 mount if someone else got it. That's not the case. You however do not care about the actual reward, you only care about others not having whatever it is. I think that's kinda sad.
You didn't say that I care about as few people as possible having the reward, you said that I only care about others not having whatever it is. It is close, but not the same. And I am no demon caring that as few as possible get it either.

All I want is the integrity and meaning of the reward to retain as much significance as possible, hence I am okay with redistribution under similar conditions. This means more can have it, but have to fight and earn it vs farming an unrelated currency until you get it.

Quote Originally Posted by Saraide View Post
I see you want to make it really simple so I will respond in kind: Lets take one of the feast top 100 mounts. If everyone had it, would you care about the mount at all?
I am not 100% sure if I understand your question, so I will have to answer based on how I understand it.

If everyone had access to earning the top 100 mounts from The Feast somehow, it would depend entirely how it is obtainable. Arguably various mounts (or recolours) have been less desirable over Armour sets, therefore I could see even those have looser restrictions than reobtaining Feast Armour. However if they simply got dumped into Trophy Crystal shop or Moogle Tome event, I'd be highly disappointed. I'd know that the Mount meant at least something, so it would bother me if suddenly everyone were to run around with it.