for a year, would you rather be secretly filmed at random moments and have the footage uploaded to your social media or loose $100 when ever you said a curse word?
No, what is funny is people roaming around on here thinking that because a player was historically banned for using a feature of a third-party tool, it should preclude the developers from ever incorporating it as a native feature, especially when many features are added natively as part of QoL can be and are derived/influenced on third-party features.
Someone was banned for a feature later incorporated into the game as it has a reasonable and practical application, get over it. The dev team is not the people issuing the bans. That's just the GMs following their guideline, equally, I don't think the developers have the time to take on consulting with GMs on every single case before banning them.
Common sense would have told me that this was at least a good sign on the developers' side as it shows a willingness to not only look at why these programs are being used but whether the reasons or the features can be applied natively. But then I suppose common just isn't too common.
Last edited by Kaurhz; 11-12-2022 at 06:44 AM.
It's the fishing log update !![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.