In this case, he is "attacking" the data, because his comments on the source are not to do with the fact that he personally dislikes them, but explicitly that this statistical data has not gone through a process to ensure that the sample in question is representative of the broader playerbase, which realistically only SE possesses the means to do - other, unaffiliated parties could do it but it'd be a much harder and more resource-intensive undertaking for them. It is in the context of striker using this data as evidence of what the broader playerbase thinks, and Kazhar is correct to point out that this issue means that inference cannot be made. The data is fine if one understands its limitations.
Is this going to be some two wrongs make a right type game? That data is pretty ill-suited if you're trying to claim it represents the will of some great majority of players (or inversely that it allows us to deduce from it what opinions are held by a supposed tiny minority), as striker is doing, and then routinely claiming, as he does, that people need to qualify how they word things while ignoring his own advice. Beyond that, I'm not interested in some tit-for-tat between the two posters - I am sure Aveyond can defend themselves against any grievances you and others may have with them.
Good post. He's gone on record now a few times stipulating what he thinks a future MMO should or could) do (here, here and here, for instance.) I very strongly suspect he'd like to start with a clean slate, where he is unburdened by the technical restrictions of a game like XIV. Can't say I am too keen on Forspoken serving as a source of inspiration given what I've seen of it (unless you just mean its combat systems), but XVI is a different story entirely and at least appears to be an intriguing setting. I'm curious to see how XVI does and what he plans to work on next after it, XIV aside.



Reply With Quote


