Glamour restrictions: a hinderance to creativity

[Lihtleita]

nobody should be allowed to eat mustard because i think its icky >

[Bobby66]

Your own personal stance on the subject being you don't actually care, but you don't want anyone else to have it either...which is total garbage. Seriously. Piss off.

I mean you can look at it that way, but I do feel that only really holds merit if you make the assumption that my stance has any barring on what SE does. Clearly it does not, so why does it matter if I voice my stance? I am not here telling you should not voice your stance or should feel a certain way about the topic. I highly doubt the reason SE has not done it yet is because people like myself prefer the restrictions, and I am willing to bet we are in the minority so our existence most likely holds very little weight on the subject.

It is a public forum and not an echo chamber.

[Darthgummibear]

I mean you can look at it that way, but I do feel that only really holds merit if you make the assumption that my stance has any barring on what SE does. Clearly it does not, so why does it matter if I voice my stance? I am not here telling you should not voice your stance or should feel a certain way about the topic. I highly doubt the reason SE has not done it yet is because people like myself prefer the restrictions, and I am willing to bet we are in the minority so our existence most likely holds very little weight on the subject.

It is a public forum and not an echo chamber.

Being a public forum is no excuse for you going into threads for the sole purpose of being antagonistic.

[Bobby66]

Being a public forum is no excuse for you going into threads for the sole purpose of being antagonistic.

Sure I am voicing opposition to the idea, but isn't one point of the forum to share different stances? Or are threads meant to be solely echo chambers for the topic within the thread? I would see an issue if I have been hostile or told others they should not feel the way they do. I do not feel I have said anything that warrants being told to piss off. I have respected your and others views throughout all of this.

[Darthgummibear]

Sure I am voicing an opposition to the idea, but isn't one point of the forum to share different stances? I would see an issue if I have been hostile or told others they should not feel the way they do. I do not feel I have said anything that warrants being told to piss off. I have respected your views throughout all of this.

No, you are being classic passive aggressive and nobody is buying it.

[Bobby66]

No, you are being classic passive aggressive and nobody is buying it.

Not being in favor of something is now being passive aggressive? I get it you have your stance that is cool, not everyone is obligated to share the same view.

[Raikai]

I mean you can look at it that way, but I do feel that only really holds merit if you make the assumption that my stance has any barring on what SE does. Clearly it does not, so why does it matter if I voice my stance? I am not here telling you should not voice your stance or should feel a certain way about the topic. I highly doubt the reason SE has not done it yet is because people like myself prefer the restrictions, and I am willing to bet we are in the minority so our existence most likely holds very little weight on the subject.

It is a public forum and not an echo chamber.

Again, this implementation would have zero impact in your life and you didn't present a single good argument on why you think it's not a good idea other than "I just don't like it". There's literally nothing to discuss on the grounds of your posts.

[Bobby66]

Again, this implementation would have zero impact in your life and you didn't present a single good argument on why you think it's not a good idea other than "I just don't like it". There's literally nothing to discuss on the grounds of your posts.

I mean when it comes to having features added to a game you play, not liking it is a valid reason. Not everyone has to be in an agreement for everything everyone likes. Sure it has no impact and I can work around it, are you saying because it can be worked around I should just go along with liking something I generally find unnecessary / have no desire for? I do not think those in favor of more options should be fine with how things are if they do not like it, voice your feedback and do everything in your power to get your point across but telling others that disagree they should piss off seems a tad silly imo.

Like I said before I have not presented an argument because in truth I am not trying to sway anyone nor will anyone ever really come up with a "good" argument that will sway one from current position. This is one of those topics having a debate over is kind of pointless cause both sides are stuck in their ways, since they largely boil down to preference. Sure we can make arguments but largely for the most part they are based around feeling.

[Darthgummibear]

are you saying because it can be worked around I should just go along with liking something I generally find unnecessary / have no desire for?

Your hypocrisy knows no bounds.

[Bobby66]

Your hypocrisy knows no bounds.

How is that the case? I have not said you should feel the way I do about restrictions. Nor have I said you should like the current situation of glam. Idk just seems like you are annoyed that someone simply does not agree with your stance regarding glam.

As I said this largely boils down to me saying I like the way things are now, and I see no need for change. Yet you are saying no you cannot say that, you must agree with what we want because it has no impact on you personally. I mean sure it has no impact, it is still valid to like the ways things and not want change. I am in no way preventing this change from happening. I am dumb so might have to point out the hypocrisy, but for the most part I think this just boils down to a disagreement.

How you feel towards glam is valid, and maybe SE will listen and remove the restrictions. It is not like SE does surveys on this stuff and not my view on this topic is even popular. So not like you have to worry about my stance preventing this from happening. Though idk I do not see SE going back, maybe I could see them not having restrictions moving forward though.