Have only one working hand, cleared all of savage this tier. I don't think it's really fair to lump all people who have a disability into your argument of not wanting content to get more difficult.Wonderful. Another attempt by someone with an elitist mindset to make the game more difficult for everyone. I thought savage level content was good enough for those who wanted a greater challenge. You DO realize, I hope, that some of us might be elderly or disabled or both and would likely be excluded by your elitist vision of what the game should be like. As some have already mentioned here, it is most likely that you would cause significant reductions in the player base if you got your way and turned the game into an elitist sandbox. A sandbox that would start to dwindle away as the few remaining players would not be sufficient to support the game. Be careful what you wish for.
Fine strawman argument you are making there. I said nothing of what other people who may be elderly or disabled, want. I said that some who are elderly and/or disabled would be excluded. Primarily because some of them would not be able to physically do the harder content. If you want an example of one such person, that would be me. I am elderly and have Parkinson's disease.
But it's the same with people who are fully abled or not elderly, some people can whereas others can't. my issue is that you're using it to try and validate your argument over others.Fine strawman argument you are making there. I said nothing of what other people who may be elderly or disabled, want. I said that some who are elderly and/or disabled would be excluded. Primarily because some of them would not be able to physically do the harder content. If you want an example of one such person, that would be me. I am elderly and have Parkinson's disease.
What an ridiculous conclusion that is. It is a FACT that some people will be excluded if the MSQ content is made harder. For some of us, the MSQ content is already at our limits. People WILL be excluded if the content is made harder. And your argument is....that's good? As long as you get your challenging content it's ok to exclude some of us? What a selfish person you are! There is already challenging content for you. Leave the MSQs alone so that more of us can play.
I’m sorry but if the MSQ is pushing you to your legit limits maybe an MMO is not the type of genre for you, the MSQ is 90% of the games core content making it as simple as it is and even simpler is being selfish on the other endWhat an ridiculous conclusion that is. It is a FACT that some people will be excluded if the MSQ content is made harder. For some of us, the MSQ content is already at our limits. People WILL be excluded if the content is made harder. And your argument is....that's good? As long as you get your challenging content it's ok to exclude some of us? What a selfish person you are! There is already challenging content for you. Leave the MSQs alone so that more of us can play.
And here we go with the ultimate elitist mentality. It's the "get out of our game mentality". THIS is disgusting.
And here we have the classic elitist mindset on display, not a surprise given the poster. FFXIV already shows that an MMO can be exactly the kind of genre for such a person, simply by using the the approach it does of making the MSQ accessible to anyone, and then providing a plethora of additional optional content that is more difficult. It also contains the classic "I'm going to lie and not care" by claiming the MSQ is most of the game, when FFXIV in particular has an enormous amount of core content besides the MSQ (all of your trials, raids, etc. are still core content).
It's not "selfish" to make one important piece (the main story) easier and then provide a slew of more difficult optional content. It is selfish to insist that said one piece that is the main story and unlocks other content be made more difficult and exclude people when that more difficult content already exists. One view has a variety of content available for a variety of people. The other ignores that more difficult content already exists, and wants even the easier stuff made harder. Only one of those views is selfish.
They're saying they don't like being thrown under your generalized umbrella of what you believe those with disabilities to be capable of or uncapable of. They dislike you using them as a part of your argument as you're dehumanizing them.What an ridiculous conclusion that is. It is a FACT that some people will be excluded if the MSQ content is made harder. For some of us, the MSQ content is already at our limits. People WILL be excluded if the content is made harder. And your argument is....that's good? As long as you get your challenging content it's ok to exclude some of us? What a selfish person you are! There is already challenging content for you. Leave the MSQs alone so that more of us can play.
Good God are you ever trying to reach. Everything in your post is a complete fabrication and it's disgusting. I made no generalizations of the kind you suggest. There will definitely be some people who will be excluded from MSQs. Not all people with disabilities or who are aged fall into this category and I never made such a statement. I was referring to people such as myself and others that I know of who have similar difficulties playing this game. Do you even understand English? Do you not understand that some of us does not mean ALL of us? Again with the strawman arguments and gaslighting. If you want to call out someone for making a sweeping generalization, you should be calling out ForteNightshade for claiming that the only people who would be excluded by making MSQs harder would be those "who want to put in almost no effort yet still expect a clear". And for you to claim that I am USING people who are aged and/or have disabilities and dehumanizing them is a bloody lie and an insult. I KNOW of other people like myself who struggle to play these games. None of them want to give up playing. None of us consider any of us to be less than human. You are the only one here who is tossing out this idiotic argument.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.