I don't think that Endwalker was ever about passing judgement at all. Here's a little interview snippet about Ishikawa's views on antagonists from Stormblood, although I can't find the original interview link right now. I think that the move towards more sympathetic antagonists represents a more gradual shift in the storytelling since Heavensward.
You don't have to agree with someone's actions to understand the 'why' behind it. You don't need to personally experience their emotions to be able to empathize with what's being expressed.
One thing that I will say - I've always been impressed at how patiently this game's writers have historically been able to sit on secrets for the sake of a bigger dramatic payout down the road. T12's extended cutscene nearly three years after the original 'End of an Era' one is an excellent example. That's one of the main reasons why I think there's not much point formulating a judgement until after Pandaemonium and Myths are fully out.
What makes it so bizarre is the fact that the story writers' words are the only thing that we have to go on. If they want to paint a character in a negative light, they can just choose to characterize them as maliciously evil. I think they've actually chosen the more challenging writing task by trying to get the playerbase to empathize with all parties involved, when some fans seem to want to polarize everything down into factional absolutes.
On the subject, though - I do note that a lot of the discussion in this thread has been unfortunately been derailed by a particular individual posting on alt accounts. I ordinarily wouldn't have an issue with such, ah, roleplaying, shall we say, but I dislike the fact that it's being used as a means for targeted harassment. He's been very careless, though, across his very extensive posting history, and you even accidentally managed to catch out two of his alts at one point. It then made it relatively easy to completely unravel the rest once I knew precisely what I was looking for. I do hope that he comes to his senses and reins it in a bit, because he does put out some well-written and interesting posts on his main posting account despite being unnecessarily stubborn. This is really not worth it for him in the long run. Sometimes it's just better to 'agree to disagree', right?



Reply With Quote


