Quote Originally Posted by Lunaxia View Post
I'm glad someone's brought this up, because I'm more than raising my eyebrow at how some people are trying to subtly jab at previously discussed issues with G'raha's character and make out they come from petty gripes to do with bitterness or how he presents himself rather than valid criticism.
It's actually a common tactic and one I've dealt with over on the lore forum quite often. Where valid points will be 'questioned' with some comment from another thread by a completely different poster. As if there can't be multiple reasons why someone opposes a particular situation or character.

What's interesting is that this sniping often comes from the very same posters who demand to be explicitly catered to if they happen to be 'uncomfortable' with a particular situation or character themselves.

On my end, if people like G'raha? Fair enough! More power to those that do and I'm happy to agree to disagree on the matter. I'm not going to pretend as the writing and behaviour of the character isn't tied to my criticism of Endwalker though because he very much is.

He's just another bunch of pixels on the screen at the end of the day and as we know, a decent amount of people like Meteion and Venat. It just comes across as hypocritical to me to declare those two 'fair game' but G'raha as a problem to criticise.