In a game with E8S why is SE banning people with suggestive Adventurer Plates?

[Bad_Luck]

Because I don't want to see a close up of a hrothgar's crotch.

You might see that walking down the street dawg.

[Shibi]

You might see that walking down the street dawg.

Those ones have ears.

[FoxyAreku]

Those ones have ears.

Okay I laughed, you got me.

[Zanarkand-Ronso]

Those ones have ears.

These Arnt Hrothgar good sir.
These are Lupin

[Reinhardt_Azureheim]

These Arnt Hrothgar good sir.
These are Lupin

[Zanarkand-Ronso]

You might see that walking down the street dawg.

What kinda town do you visit?.....asking for a friend <_<;

[Vryn]

What kinda town do you visit?.....asking for a friend <_<;

This happens in every city. he's correct that if it's in the game, players will use it in this manner; your opinion on their glamour doesn't matter; Square put a system in the game which is easily abused. This abuse has led to degenerate behaviour, which was to be expected.

You cannot give players a system knowing full well that they will use it in a perverted manner and then ban them from expressing themselves. It's on Square to do the right thing and rework the system rather than harassing its player base for using the tools as they are expected to be used.

It's like the government selling suggestive clothes and then expelling people from society for using them in a low-class passport photo.

If anything, the easiest solution would be to allow people to set their plates as above 18 or NSFW and give people the option to see it or not.

[Scaramouche]

This happens in every city. he's correct that if it's in the game, players will use it in this manner; your opinion on their glamour doesn't matter; Square put a system in the game which is easily abused. This abuse has led to degenerate behaviour, which was to be expected.

You cannot give players a system knowing full well that they will use it in a perverted manner and then ban them from expressing themselves. It's on Square to do the right thing and rework the system rather than harassing its player base for using the tools as they are expected to be used.

It's like the government selling suggestive clothes and then expelling people from society for using them in a low-class passport photo.

If anything, the easiest solution would be to allow people to set their plates as above 18 or NSFW and give people the option to see it or not.

Just because I can name my character doesn't mean I can call it Deck Soccer and not get in trouble.

[kaynide]

This happens in every city. he's correct that if it's in the game, players will use it in this manner; your opinion on their glamour doesn't matter; Square put a system in the game which is easily abused. This abuse has led to degenerate behaviour, which was to be expected.

You cannot give players a system knowing full well that they will use it in a perverted manner and then ban them from expressing themselves. It's on Square to do the right thing and rework the system rather than harassing its player base for using the tools as they are expected to be used.

It's like the government selling suggestive clothes and then expelling people from society for using them in a low-class passport photo.

If anything, the easiest solution would be to allow people to set their plates as above 18 or NSFW and give people the option to see it or not.

This is not a thing. The game can not have 18+ nonsense due to their target sales audience and game ratings.

Your examples are also off; you can buy suggestive/revealing clothing here and now all day long, but it doesn’t mean you can or should wear them in a sexually suggestive manner in an inappropriate place. Nobody would blink an eye of you taking tasteful pictures at the beach in your bikini. Or a 2b Cosplay. Or whatever.

…until you start positioning the camera under your skirt, down your blouse or holding an object in a suggestive manner…


Or, more to the point, just because you can buy cucumbers and bikinis at Walmart doesn’t mean you should be doing onlyfans poses at Walmart.

[Vryn]

This is not a thing. The game can not have 18+ nonsense due to their target sales audience and game ratings.

Your examples are also off; you can buy suggestive/revealing clothing here and now all day long, but it doesn’t mean you can or should wear them in a sexually suggestive manner in an inappropriate place. Nobody would blink an eye of you taking tasteful pictures at the beach in your bikini. Or a 2b Cosplay. Or whatever.

…until you start positioning the camera under your skirt, down your blouse or holding an object in a suggestive manner…


Or, more to the point, just because you can buy cucumbers and bikinis at Walmart doesn’t mean you should be doing onlyfans poses at Walmart.

Yeah, they can. They don't have to call it an NSFW filter. You have said since the game is not an 18, they cannot have restrictions on certain glamour or give people the option not to see certain conditions on glamour. That's like saying we shouldn't give people the profanity filter, or they shouldn't put such types of glamour in the game because it shows too much skin. There are plenty of ways to do this that wouldn't affect the overall user experience for people.

What you have is a system designed to be easily exploitable, and people will do so whether you like it or not. I could say that the fact that they put a stripper pole in the game or a brothel in one expansion that the game shouldn't be in a 16+ category. We could also say that since people erotically roleplay, they should be banned for such things since they are abusing the in-game chat function that was not intended. There are a million ways you could say this game does not meet the requirements of a 16+. It just takes imagination.

Saying that since people can buy things together, they shouldn't use them doesn't matter because they will.

How about you live in reality for five and deal with the situation at hand instead of pushing head cannon and pretending you know the law or the internal thoughts of the dev team.

You are just participating in the form of low grade thought designed to push an unproportionate response.

For example, a reasonable step in the right direction would be privacy settings that would encompass things such as cultural beliefs, therefore if a glamour might be seen as degenerate it won't allow you to access their card or see it in PVP.

How about you provide more options to the player to protect themselves rather than lowering the quality of service to everyone.