To potency per minute, yes, of course. But to gameplay? Is spending only 1 in 18 GCDs, down from 1 in 9, on anything other than (<your filler-proc> over <your filler itself>) a gameplay improvement?
Yes, but so would those DoTs be snapshotted, just the same, without IJ. It would just take 2 GCDs, down from 1.It is still, however, used to snapshot raid buffs. Even with the 45 second duration that the DoTs have now.
...At no point have I said that using Iron Jaws is inferior to reusing the DoTs separately, merely that so long as you would have (re)applied your DoTs in all the same situations (as you would have in single-target combat since Stormblood) without IJ as you would with IJ, then IJ has generated no unique gameplay value.And it still nets BRD a cast of Burst Shot versus doing Stormbite > Caustic Bite. Burst Shot is more potent, hence it is obviously the better GCD choice.
It is essentially a Caustic Bite trait that causes Stormbite also to be applied, except that it be used at the start of combat, and therefore can't reduce the time required for your DoTs to pay off, and takes up an extra button.
For that reason, Iron Jaws is not, in present contexts, a well-designed ability. It is an ability that exists to increase your filler action from 88.8% (16 of 18) of your GCD casts to 94.4% (17 of 18), but then charges you an extra button for the pleasure of spamming your filler more. It's an ability that actually give more diversity in button-flow, and slightly greater rotational complexity, for having been removed.
:: To be clear, I'm not even advocating its removal here, only pointing out that protecting every action/button at all costs, regardless of their actual impact on rotation, is not a great idea.
I never said IJ was spammed. I said IJ led to even less time being spent on anything but your spam (Refulgent>Burst). Which it has.IJ wasn’t really spammed in Stormblood.
Heavy Shot spam "was already overly prevalent". Iron Jaws then "resulted in more spam" despite that.
In HW, it at least created certain new thresholds for DoT's (re)application, which gave some positives to offset that negative. It has not, however, done so since.



Reply With Quote


