
Originally Posted by
Kyohei
All those reasons fail in a logical way when compared to many other things weighting on the balance, PawPaw cited a good lot of them.
She did not tell them, again see to Shadowbringers. No ancient knew, no ascians knew. What you cited is Venat's thought process of "ifs". What she ended up with is a close group of people that summoned Hydaelyn.
Everything about the lack of suffering is from Venat's personal convictions, it's from her lenses only that the story speaks of that, not a broad generality. If we talk about that ancient in Venat's cutscene, compared to the Final days of course their world was blissful. If such a calamity with impending doom were to happen to any world, I'm pretty sure anyone would want their old world back and think of it as the best it ever was. Look at covid and how people just wanted things "back to how they were", and it's not nearly the same level as general destruction brought by the Final days nor close to its horror.
The ancient were as varied as sundered mankind with only a life system in common. We can see with Hermes that they can have deep, even devouring emotions too. It would be very strange from him to be the only one, except he is one that can't deal with it properly and with maturity. So even if they can't manipulate dynamis, they very well can create beings not necessarily flawed. Nothing supports "lack of understanding suffering" other than simply the story giving you this at face value as a way to justify itself and make one look away from inconsistencies.
The ancient not being strong enough in heart and mind fails too as an argument when you have ascians struggling for 12k years alone to bring back what they promised to their brethren, and on the other side Venat becoming Hydaelyn also is proof they do have what it takes.
All in all, narration fails on a logical level. The substance might not be bad, but it was handled poorly with many flaws and contradictions that leave opening for finding it lacking.