Quote Originally Posted by DarkDredgen View Post
You can voice your opinion without having to discredit others opinions on an entirely subjective matter.

Your parents should have taught you that when you were like 5 years old.

I like Monk with a few less positionals.

..I also like seeing a bunch of socially inept people on the Internet get mad because I don't like the same things they do lol
Opinions are there to be voiced and criticised, if you could not criticise an opinion, who knows what sort of ideas could be thrown around. I always encourage people to challenge my ideas/opinions and that can only come with conversations. This can also lead to better understanding between parties about what is good and what is bad. This is the basis of Critical Analysis which aims to broaden a person's way of thinking. This is something you should have been taught when you were older and is one of the principles of having a proper discussion.

Also;

In ShB, Monk was the sole job with alot of positional requirements in a role that had 4 options in total.
In EW, Monk is now a job with few positionals in a role that has 5 options.
People liked the fact there was a job that had a high positional count.
People are upset that the one job that fit a gameplay they enjoy is now gone.

All of those points are objective facts. We have lost a playstyle for...no reason? Doesn't help that when the changes were implemented, this same guy basically came on here and gloated about it, essentially rubbing it in our faces with a big screw you.

Positionals being removed because of PB was something given by devs, but they could have done something different, like Perfect Balance removing positional requirements, that way, during the PB window where there is alot going on, you do not have to worry about them. Instead, they went the route where they took it away from everything and the gameplay suffered for it.

We get the argument of, you don't like Monk? Play something else? What exactly? Nothing has loads of positionals, there is nothing else. If you didn't like positionals, you would have 4 melee to choose from compared to our 1 choice in Monk.

The side that presents positionals as a positive for the job have always come back with arguments about how they make a job more engaging, pointing out the hypocrisy from other others and all we get in return is not a discussion, it is more of a tough balls, I do not care. I even encouraged the conversation in post 86 essentially pleading, tell me why you do not like them, let me understand, but they have not responded to it. Would I have criticised their points? Of course, but that is what I want, feel free to criticise me as well, I am not afraid of what someone has to say or having my mind changed, but so far, no arguments have been compelling enough to change it.