Quote Originally Posted by Lauront View Post
????
I'm well familiar with the passage, having cited it to you on previous occasions. What's the relevance here? The Convocation were short-sighted in assuming that Zodiark was a permanent solution, sure. But the Convocation were convening over the plan to sacrifice non-Amaurotian souls to free their friends. That has nothing to do with addressing the Final Days at all.

Quote Originally Posted by redheadturk View Post
Which is why I consider her actions wrong and repugnant. And I stated clearly that the Ascians were also morally wrong for their actions without consent. What the Scions did was to protect their own lives, which they had every right to do. What Azem did was to attempt to find a third option, and did not harm either side, which was also within their rights.
I can see why you would consider Venat's faction and all of Amaurot as being morally repugnant under that criteria, but I'm surprised that you aren't so willing to condemn Azem, the Scions, and the rest of humanity as well for acting similarly in their own interests. Venat's faction was acting in defense of the lives and souls of the non-Amaurotians on the star who weren't given the opportunity to consent, in much the same way that Azem and the Scions did in defense of the sundered peoples of Etheirys. I think that if you want to condemn one on that principle, you should be consistent across the board and just condemn them all. Having power to effect change is morally repugnant by those standards.