Quote Originally Posted by KariTheFox View Post
I've been wondering why people are desperate to argue that the third sacrifice would have been sapient beings that were created to be thinking and feeling purely to be killed - when it flies in the face of the thematic meaning of the story, makes every character involved look like an idiot, and has not been mentioned once by a single character, ever. And the only conclusion I can see is that it's because it makes the Ancients look bad..
Presented without comment.

Quote Originally Posted by EaraGrace View Post
Yes, moral disagreements are common. That does not change however, the fact that there are right and wrong actions. Unless you believe all actions morally equal?
If we believe the narrative presentation about the non-existence of an extant meaning in life beyond what one chooses for themselves, that is a perfectly reasonable conclusion.

Quote Originally Posted by EaraGrace View Post
There’s no indication that he ever was told the possibility of their disappearance. So let that be clear.