And this is the flawed argument that these threads always dissolve into: for some, optimization and playing well and using parsers to improve themselves isn’t a job. It’s their idea of fun. It’s disdainful to see that so many resort to using this argument at the end of the line as if it carries any sort of weight to it.
All I have said is that your methods don’t yield the results that you think they do. If you find them enjoyable, it’s one thing. But to imply that they work as well as or better than a parser is flawed.
If this works for you, then that’s fine. But this thread was made by someone who wants to join a high-end static that has set requirements and criteria and expectations of its joiners. Instead of advocating that they look for a static more in line with their own goals, it has instead dissolved into a thread bickering about how parsers are against the ToS, how they gatekeep Savage, those who use them seek only to turn the game into a part-time or full-time job, and they should be reported on-sight as if they were some sort of toxic blight on the community. And again, I say, “GCBTW, indeed”.
The groups that do have specific goals in mind—who are you, me, or anyone else to dictate what that static does? It isn’t any of our business what the raid leader and the raid group decide are criteria for joining their group, just like it isn’t our business what a PF leader designates as criteria to join their PF.
As are a lot of raid leads. I have raided some astoundingly awesome and skilled players—unfortunately, they have also had astoundingly bad attitudes, and I no longer associate with them. A lot of groups will take a purple parsing individual with a positive and constructive attitude over an orange player that treats their raid mates like trash. Just because a group advocates a minimum skill level doesn’t mean they will ignore players that are horrible people.I’m more interested in the character of a person in comparison to the numbers they can pump out. A parse log won’t tell me if they are decent human being or someone I’d rather not play with. I would rather that be the yardstick by which individuals are measured, it it comes to that.
SE won’t do anything. They have ample opportunity to ban parsers and their use, and actually enforce their ToS. But they do not. They know what will happen if they do. Even if they managed to figure out a way to cause ACT and FFLogs to no longer interact with the game, someone else will just come up with another workaround. It would be a never-ending battle, so they choose to just look the other way. And have for years.Folks are free to do what they want. But the inherent risks should be acknowledged and understood and not simply brushed off as “ SE won’t so anything. “ Been around too long to know contrary to that way of thinking.
They may not ever do anything. Then again, they may change their mind down the road. I just choose to not use it and involve myself with the tools the game avails me.



Reply With Quote


