Thoughts of Samurai Changes

[Theodric_Thorne]

If you're not streaming nor screenshotting your UI, there may or may not be mods meant to deal with exactly that (and reduce button bloat in the process).

A disabled gamer should not have to violate ToS to make the game more accessible. Yet every time I see this concern brought up, I see responses suggesting that expanding PvP-style combos into PvE would single-handedly destroy the entire game. Why is it that arbitrarily hitting more buttons is somehow considered objectively more fun than hitting a smaller selection of buttons multiple times?

[Shurrikhan]

A disabled gamer should not have to violate ToS to make the game more accessible. Yet every time I see this concern brought up, I see responses suggesting that expanding PvP-style combos into PvE would single-handedly destroy the entire game. Why is it that arbitrarily hitting more buttons is somehow considered objectively more fun than hitting a smaller selection of buttons multiple times?

Simple. Many prefer the pretense of depth over actual depth. It lets the Dragoon point at a Subtlety Rogue's toolkit and say "Ha, I have more buttons" as if that let it have more than a third the decision-making.

It's especially funny when the same people swearing that button consolidation (even the likes of Blizzard IV into Fire IV based on stance) would destroy the game also advocate for the removal of (de)buffs to track or positionals on their skills...

[Warlyx]

A disabled gamer should not have to violate ToS to make the game more accessible. Yet every time I see this concern brought up, I see responses suggesting that expanding PvP-style combos into PvE would single-handedly destroy the entire game. Why is it that arbitrarily hitting more buttons is somehow considered objectively more fun than hitting a smaller selection of buttons multiple times?

u mean like how monk is played now?