Can SQ-EN draw a line in the sand w/ 3rd Parties?

[Lanadra]

Problem is they likely not to act on such a report where a streamer show off ACT or whatever.

Oh I agree, it's not likely they'll hammer down a streamer just because they got ACT on their screen. But I suspect it'll be rather different with things that do quite obviously skirt the lines of acceptability, like Cactbot.

[Sotaris]

Oh I agree, it's not likely they'll hammer down a streamer just because they got ACT on their screen. But I suspect it'll be rather different with things that do quite obviously skirt the lines of acceptability, like Cactbot.

I'd guess no but not sure if we ever had a example being made of someone streaming and using cactbot.
iirc they did crack down on people who used the auto markers though so there is some they are intolerante against, unless I imagined that.

If I understood correctly in the past, isn’t SE not going to take external sources such as those videos because of the possibility of being ‘doctored’?

More of less, that's the main reason I believe they aren't doing anything against people announcing sell runs on PF and refer to Discord servers for further discussion.

[Lanadra]

I'd guess no but not sure if we ever had a example being made of someone streaming and using cactbot.
iirc they did crack down on people who used the auto markers though so there is some they are intolerante against, unless I imagined that.

You'd be surprised how quickly action can be taken once something starts to go out of hand.

[Sotaris]

You'd be surprised how quickly action can be taken once something starts to go out of hand.

Of course, like anything in life.

How do voice comms work with that? Discord app on a phone?

omg using 3rd party apps! /s