Quote Originally Posted by Grimoire-M View Post
Easy. Reduce all of their healing potency to the lowest values they existed at, and undo some QoL. Indom goes back to 300 potency, Lustrate down to ARR physick at 400 potency, excog matches ARR cure II at 600 potency and loses the auto detonation buff. Adlo goes to a 300/300 split as does Succor to 150/150. You know, just back to your good old ARR numbers. Fairy doesn’t keep the pet action resolution improvements that came with ShB but remains tied to our oGCD space so if you ever overcrowd her queue she drops actions consistently even without ghosting factored in. There’s more you could do, but you can survive on that.

Again, Scholar’s design is what makes it broken. The numbers just keep it fair. In a game all about minimizing healing having the easiest time sacrificing the least of its DPS resources kept it relevant even when it’s DPS was the worst of the three. I don’t think it needs this grand revival. Just good tuning and an actual rotation like every other healer. Every single one of its problems aren’t even unique to it thanks to Summoner. Scholar has been balanced around high oGCD frequency to make up for its throughput issues and as long as it has that edge in flexibility it’s going to synergize well enough with WHM and AST to always remain relevant. SE has to screw up Sage just for it to be preferred over Scholar. If that isn’t proof of just how little attention it needs don’t know what’ll convince you otherwise.
The point just soars right over your and Roeshel's head doesn't it?