
Originally Posted by
Skivvy
Sooooo question for all you people who may know more of what the actual book entails, bozja lore and maybe thoughts as far as timing go...
What do you think the likelihood is that the picture from the book was created prior to femhroth truly being a twinkle in the Dev's eyes? Could it be that they just drew something feline'ish to satisfy the art/lore of Bozja as they never expected femhroths to come to life?
According to YP, the graphics team spent about 6 months after the release of ShB to draw up a proposal on how to fit in the genders into their pipeline and that's when he gave the thumbs up to start working on em. So I'd say for over half a year before the relic quest would even go live the devs knew they would make these genders and were working on em.
There's also the fact that they went through the effort to make canon in universe art of Hrothgals (The mural) for that quest line that look like this Queen. People can have w/e opinions they want, but I personally don't think the devs would willy nilly fk with the lore like that. If they don't know what they want something to look like, they wouldn't half ass a depiction of it and put it in the game for a tiny narrative beat that didn't need to be there. They're also good at their job, so I'm sure they know how to make a "generic cat face" that doesn't look human if they desired.

Originally Posted by
Iscah
Occam's Razor (or Thaliak's, as I've noted people say in-game) is defined on the Wikipedia page as:
Having applied that, given the choice between:
A) they built a special new body model to represent female Hrothgar even though they stuck a Roegadyn head on it, which does not particularly match the mural, despite the fact that they are otherwise so low-priority that the devs are putting 100% work into male Viera before turning their attention to Hrothgar, or
B) they decided early on that she had to be a Roegadyn, but wanted her to look prettier so they used a different female body model,
...B is the simpler answer and does not make the huge assumption that because it is a "new" body model, regardless of exactly how they arrived at it, it must be a Hrothgar model.
The irony in your reply is that your logic is failed from the start by making assumptions.
"Putting 100% work into male Viera"
We have absolutely no reason to assume that they haven't worked on Hrothgals, we simply know that they're focused on releasing Male Viera first for 6.0 and Hrothgals "when every we finish them". There's no reason to think that stages in the development cycle that are less taxing on development haven't been met with Hrothgals as yet or that they're sitting on their hands until 6.0. The hardest part about making a race boils down to implementing them. Making animations for them, making changes to the 1000s of items that will make up their body, QA and so on. These are the things that suck up time, man power, and are why it's so much harder to make new races the longer this game lives. Iirc both Viera and Hrothgar were designed by 1 artist respectfully as that's something 1 artist can do solo, so we can't assume that the very concept for this gender wasn't done long ago.
Furthermore, making a single unique NPC that doesn't "do" anything but a few animations isn't hard. It's pretty much the logic behind making any boss, and they do this often. Gaia is a NPC with a unique face/ hair/ outfit (AKA body), Lyse has an outfit that they can't give us yet because it wasn't built to be player friendly and Yotsuyu's outfit is apparently a complete no-go because it was only built to work for the animations she did in the story. Making something like that isn't hard, and all the queen did was float, pose and sit in a chair, so that's not outta the ordinary. We've also seen with Au Ra that they're willing to make a modified, custom NPC to indicate what a race will look like before they're ready to show.
And B makes no sense, as this art shows us finalized art of the queen without a femroe head. So if she was meant to have a Femroe head "early on" then said art would show a Femroe's head. Again, looking at the art books shows that they put finalized art of these types of character in them ... meaning that they intended for her to look like this art work up until she didn't.
Anyway, this is conflating discussions in a bad way, so lets break it down.
Topic 1- Is this a drawing of a female Hrothgar?
I would say yes, this looks exactly like the canon Hrothgal art we have in game. You would have to make a lot of assumptions to think this was a Miqote that ended up having different looking head features "just because" and turned into a Femroe face 2 instead of having a rando Miqote head for w/e reason. Given what we see, the simplest answer is that this drawing it a Hrothgar.

Topic 2- Why did the Femroe queen in game have a unique body, different from every other female?
If you accept the above as true, then you would have to accept that this character was intended to be a Hrothgar female up to the point of this finalized art. This would be a reasonable explanation as to why this character doesn't look like an arvg Femroe or any other female.
If your take is that this was always a Femroe character or one "from early on" and she got a unique body for no reason but to look pretty, you'd have to assume that this isn't finalized art, which would be in direct contrast to how they depict bosses in these books. So you'd have to assume that they're, just for this 1 character, using ... what? Ancient theoretical art instead of showing the Femroe finalized art they "should" have if they decided to make her a Femroe from early in the concept stage?
(as for the topic related to other things attached to this, if this is what the devs think a better looking Femroe looks like then ... it's a clear indication of what they feel a "better looking femroe" looks like)
Why this character in game has a Femroe face 2 as her head when the finalized art doesn't is a mystery, but this world hasn't been kind in 2020, so it's not outta the question that this may be one of those corners that may have been cut.
Also, the illustration of the Hrothgar queen doesn't look slender in the body at all. I think she looks more like the figure shown in the
other mural seen at the end of the prologue with the queen quite frankly looking closer to Dulia-Chai than the slender Roegadyn Gunnhildr. So I have an even harder time believing the body model "must" have been built for the would-be Hrothgar Gunnhildr even if the shrine maidens in the second mural are closer to it.
I can't tell what's going on with the body as she's sitting down awkwardly in a photo being taken with a bend in the page. Can't see her arms and only part of 1 leg, so I don't see the point of focusing on that.