I suspect it's not going to help much because in the end gardening isn't that popular. We'd see a lot more garden plots in use for crossbreeding if it was truly a primary reason to own a house.
Access to gardening ends up more of an excuse tacked onto reasons why the player should have a house ("so I'll already have access if I ever decide to do it") than an actual goal. If someone's interest was solely in gardening, it's not difficult to find a house owner that isn't using their garden and ask to be made a tenant(the owner can always grant garden access but block access to furnishing placement/removal, etc.). That's what I did when I was without a house prior to 4.2 ward addition. A friend made me his tenant and I started actively using his garden patch (though he refused to place the Deluxe one because he hated the scarecrow lol).
YoshiP has been very clear that Island Sanctuaries would have no competitive element. The marketboard is the most competitive element in the game. That means whatever we can grow on the Island Sanctuaries will not be the same as what we are currently growing with gardening, nor will we be able to trade/sell whatever it is to other players.
I have to disagree. Every FC owning multiple houses via member alts is another player or FC unable to get a house. Why should certain FCs be special with access to double Grade 3 actions on a daily basis when a FC with only one house can only get is one every 3 days and FCs without a house can't get them at all?
I also doubt that there are that many legitimate FCs that are multiple house owners. Most of them are going to trace back to solo players operating shells FCs for personal wealth and flexing it at other players by using the same FC tag for all their FCs.
There are two things I'd like to see happen with Ishgard's release (since I know they're not going to give us the good instanced housing system that we need). First is to finally set up all characters on same world/same account as co-owners of a house so they're officially tenants. Second is for them to crack down on the multiple house ownership that has been occurring since the 4.2 changes. If someone had ownership of the house (along with leadership of the FC if it's a FC house) prior to 4.2, then they're grandfathered in. I have no problems with that. It's those who have purchased additional houses since 4.2 that SE needs to address.



Reply With Quote



