



Its really not, the issue is people just dont like it because they want unlimited freedom and more options. They will just sit there and ask "Why?" and will never accept it.
And unless the Race/Species is written to be one type of gender, there isnt a good track record of anyone explaining why we cant have both genders available.
Male Viera are a special case, because lore WOULD explain their absence.....but its ignored and discarded because of Male Miqote in FFXIV. Plus this is an FFXIV world, and not isolated to Ivalice.
Anything that removes choice is bad. Gender locking doesn't even make sense logically.Its really not, the issue is people just dont like it because they want unlimited freedom and more options. They will just sit there and ask "Why?" and will never accept it.
And unless the Race/Species is written to be one type of gender, there isnt a good track record of anyone explaining why we cant have both genders available.
Male Viera are a special case, because lore WOULD explain their absence.....but its ignored and discarded because of Male Miqote in FFXIV. Plus this is an FFXIV world, and not isolated to Ivalice.
Looking at Tera, why can't a man wield a gun or a spear? If you want to play a male character you are locked out of HALF the race AND class options.



Doesn't have to make sense. If that's what the developers want, that's what the developers get. You don't have to like it. It isn't removing choice either. You chose to pick up that game and in doing so chose to accept what was offered.
Gamers don't die, we just go AFK
#ottergate


Sure, the devs can do whatever they want. Doesn't change the fact that what they choose to do might be bad or illogical. Looking at M Viera for instance, how is it possible that in two separate dimensions we can't see any, despite the fact that one dimension is on the brink of annihilation and that led most other races and beast tribes to join hands? Where did all the F Hroths go? How is it believable that we have to accept weird motivations as to why those genders are nowhere to be seen in two different "worlds" with different social structures? The only logical explanation is "the devs didn't have the time/resources to add them at the time". The only way a one-gender race can be accepted is if it's androgynous in biological terms, and I would be completely fine with that to be honest. Anything else is bad design/development choice with a sprinkle of resource limitation and a splash of pandering to a particular target.
After all, every time they add a new race/job the lore gets crushed a little bit. Yugiri hiding her body didn't make any sense after Au Ras where added. The existence of many people playing the same job doesn't make sense as well since in many cases said jobs are unique or extremely rare if we consider their lore. So at the end of the day, lore isn't really an explanation to design limitation, especially in a game where we're the one exception, the chosen one blah blah blah.



Considering The First =/= The Source then it doesn't matter if femgars are there or not. Or male viera for that matter. As for the job thing: the only one you'd have a point with is WHM since that's supposed to be exclusive to padjals and you're the exception. Every other job is pretty much a dime a dozen. There is no limit to the number of people that can attain the jobs in question, they just have a high skill ceiling to reach.Sure, the devs can do whatever they want. Doesn't change the fact that what they choose to do might be bad or illogical. Looking at M Viera for instance, how is it possible that in two separate dimensions we can't see any, despite the fact that one dimension is on the brink of annihilation and that led most other races and beast tribes to join hands? Where did all the F Hroths go? How is it believable that we have to accept weird motivations as to why those genders are nowhere to be seen in two different "worlds" with different social structures? The only logical explanation is "the devs didn't have the time/resources to add them at the time". The only way a one-gender race can be accepted is if it's androgynous in biological terms, and I would be completely fine with that to be honest. Anything else is bad design/development choice with a sprinkle of resource limitation and a splash of pandering to a particular target.
After all, every time they add a new race/job the lore gets crushed a little bit. Yugiri hiding her body didn't make any sense after Au Ras where added. The existence of many people playing the same job doesn't make sense as well since in many cases said jobs are unique or extremely rare if we consider their lore. So at the end of the day, lore isn't really an explanation to design limitation, especially in a game where we're the one exception, the chosen one blah blah blah.
And no, again, it's not bad design/developement just because you don't agree with it.
Gamers don't die, we just go AFK
#ottergate


WHM is unique, but many other jobs are supposed to be very rare or exotic...even the job quests make you feel somewhat special and one of a kind because you're now practicing this forgotten art or whatever. Maybe some jobs are as rare as M Vieras, who knows? So again, it doesn't make much sense and people using lore as an explanation are using double standards. I will always think that having no M Viera and F Hroths doesn't make any sense, sorry, it's simply unbelievable given the circumstances of the world and the exceptionality of our character. Unless they decide that they were all exterminated somehow, but even that would be quite unbelievable.Considering The First =/= The Source then it doesn't matter if femgars are there or not. Or male viera for that matter. As for the job thing: the only one you'd have a point with is WHM since that's supposed to be exclusive to padjals and you're the exception. Every other job is pretty much a dime a dozen. There is no limit to the number of people that can attain the jobs in question, they just have a high skill ceiling to reach.
And no, again, it's not bad design/developement just because you don't agree with it.
By the way I would even be fine with unplayable races. Just let me see them...of course at that point why not go the extra mile and just add them as a playable race? Doesn't make business sense at that point.
Ultimately, the fact that they decided to add them after all proves that lore wasn't a strong enough justification. They bended the lore before and they'll do it again.






The thing is, the choice was never between "release two whole races or just release halves".
There were three options for what could be added:
Viera M / Viera F
Hrothgar M / Hrothgar F
Hrothgar M / Viera F
Any one of those outcomes locks some players out of a choice that they want. Implement Viera M/F and the people wanting a beastlike race miss out. Implement Hrothgar M/F and the people wanting Viera miss out. Implement half-half and a large chunk of both sides get something – especially if, as they originally said, they thought it might be the last time they could ever add new character models.
That approach creates the impression of gender-locking, but it's not like they designed the characters and then walled them off. They just never existed.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.


Reply With Quote


