




That doesn't even make sense, a slippery slope argument would be about leading to bigger or more expansive things, not smaller insignificant things.I didn't say it was a slippery slope; I said it's so ridiculous that it sounds like an absurdist slippery slope argument someone would make against inclusiveness in gaming.
Example: "Removing flashing lights in an encounter to make it better for epileptics?!? What's next... altering/limiting stylized designs based on the fact that some people don't like bumpy textures?!?"
In this case a slippery slope would indicate that something somewhat reasonable would become increasingly absurd and trivial, until even the most petty of requests are deserving of action.
It may help with PR a little bit now, but it hurts later. SE can't reasonably accommodate every single aspect of everyone's sensibilities, so they've just set a precedent they can't live up to.You want to know the sort of thing setting them off? Look up image examples of trypophobia and you'll understand immediately why it's disturbing. Some people it sets off easier than others. Few things set that off in me (the previous icon did not) but I can imagine how quickly it set off some people who are really sensitive to that sort of thing. Changing it hurts nobody, and only helps SE with PR.
Last edited by Goji1639; 07-31-2021 at 04:36 AM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote


