So, a lottery system and a divide between FC and solo wards, eh?

[NanaWiloh]

Tbh I was surprised they didn't allow for this already. I agree with whoever said cut it down to 1 tenant. And like FCs, if the housing owner doesn't return after 45 days, the house is transferred to the tenant rather than demolish. Probably cut down on some of the demand for housing. Right now, being a tenant just feels like you have a teleport spot, but if anything happens to the homeowner you're out a house since you aren't the owner. And any furniture and the 80 percent of placard cost goes to the homeowner, including anything the tenant dropped in there.

The idea has merit. And would placate some people I'm sure.

I mentioned the 1 tenant idea along a restriction of 1 character per world being allowed to reset as a tenant. Its to avoid the domino effect as its called.

For those who don't get the domino effect. 1 domino knocks over 2, 2 knock over 4 and so on. Now apply that too tenancy, home owner has 3 tenants who each have a personal house with 3 tenants who...you get the idea. Letting tenants reset a timer is fine so long as its tightly restricted as described above..

[Nepentha]

I mentioned the 1 tenant idea along a restriction of 1 character per world being allowed to reset as a tenant. Its to avoid the domino effect as its called.

For those who don't get the domino effect. 1 domino knocks over 2, 2 knock over 4 and so on. Now apply that too tenancy, home owner has 3 tenants who each have a personal house with 3 tenants who...you get the idea. Letting tenants reset a timer is fine so long as its tightly restricted as described above..

Yeah there'd have to be checks in place to make sure someone doesn't end up owning more than one house. I mean, I'm a tenant at my friend's house, but I have my own personal. If SE did this they'd have to put in a check for that kind of thing and let the house just demo if tenant already owns personal housing. It'd have to keep a record of the last time the original owner walked through, and at the 45 day mark do a check on if the tenant has a personal house. If not, house automatically goes to them. If so, house demos.

[NanaWiloh]

Yeah there'd have to be checks in place to make sure someone doesn't end up owning more than one house. I mean, I'm a tenant at my friend's house, but I have my own personal. If SE did this they'd have to put in a check for that kind of thing and let the house just demo if tenant already owns personal housing. It'd have to keep a record of the last time the original owner walked through, and at the 45 day mark do a check on if the tenant has a personal house. If not, house automatically goes to them. If so, house demos.

In all honesty the foundation for the exploit is already present in the game. Its just lacks tenants ability to reset the demo timer to bring it full circle. And Mafia was the wrong word to describe it Housing Monopoly fits better.