Results -9 to 0 of 15256

Dev. Posts

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    SturmChurro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    7,073
    Character
    Sturm Churro
    World
    Marilith
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by KizuyaKatogami View Post
    They at least made the femroe make sense in accordance to the story so i give them props for that. I think it’s a pretty obvious idea that they didn’t add female hrothgar because they know they wouldn’t be as popular, considering the play rate of femroes. Resources are better put to races that will get played by more players. This game is the very definition of shoehorning. Look at the male miqote showhorn they did after 1.0. They constantly add things to pander to the playerbase that don’t exactly make sense. Idk why people act like this is any different or is somehow worse. It makes sense for Male Viera to be a playable race just as much as female hroth so idk where that logic is coming from? As for the au ra comment, nothing to do with you. female au ra is just the one race/gender combo i find the least appealing personally. So i used it as an example. Nothing against you.
    Personally, I don't really see why we needed male viera so much more than female hrothgar. It's a novelty. The concept of feminine males was already filled with that addition of male miqo'te, and male miqo'te will still be quite a bit more popular in general. Mooncat male miqo'te even fill that certain* niche or whatever I think was being talked about yesterday.. So, to be frank, female hrothgar would have simply been the better choice. In ever possible aspect. They would have added much more to the game. If a race has to be limited, at least there is some justification with hrothgar - with their high quality animal heads! Male viera just have what looks like glued on ears to me, and just that makes them limited!
    (0)
    Last edited by SturmChurro; 06-28-2021 at 07:16 PM.