Quote Originally Posted by SomeRandomHuman View Post
It's funny that GMs only listen to the accusing side like it's gospel. Especially when the best evidence they're given is probably just as fabricated. They don't us the benefit of the doubt, so why should we give it to them?
I was under the impression that before issuing a strike, a GM would verify the accusation using their access to the internal database chat logs (which are stored for at least a couple of days before being overwritten, since text is cheap to store.) This includes private conversations in tells, not just public chat channels.