Roleplay/Partyfinder Discrepancies & Policy Enforcement by GM's

[Saefinn]

What I am referring to is firsthand information, from a player who was talked to by a GM. They received a ToS violation for profanity.

One may choose to believe all that is presented in this thread, but it is not necessarily all true. We can argue for hours, but the fact of the matter, players are getting hit for adult advertisements, the received email after the GM interaction cites "profanity" as the ToS violation. Simple as that. A person may or may not disagree with SE, or the GM's choice of ToS violation, or even how they handled the jail interaction, but that doesn't change the fact of the matter.

Then that's specific to that interaction and doesn't reflect these other interactions where profanity is not cited but PF use and not indicative of them going scorched earth on any RP PF posts. Evidence of the cases in question point to a GM getting the ruling wrong rather than an SE scorched earch approach on ERPer and general RPers being hit as collateral. This is where I am seeing too many assumptions.