Quote Originally Posted by SturmChurro View Post
Snip.
Whilst I agree there is an issue with moderation and enforcement.

But your claim doesn't match the GM's reasoning or their actions.

Profanity isn't mentioned in the logs, ERP isn't brought up, social use of PF is given as the reasoning and advice given on how to advertise social RP without violating the PF's intended use. Not to stop advertising ERP. Everything about their handling suggests social use of the PF is the problem.

This is where the disconnect is between the two arguments.

There was the report transcript somebody posted of them speaking to a GM to report ERP advertisements, they gave a list of offenders and the GM said they would investigate them. This is the only evidence I see to tie ERP, we don't know this was the report that triggered it but the GM's approach suggests nothing scorched earth here but looking at specific cases. They've not even affirmed ERP use is an offense, a previous GM suggested it isn't.

I think too many assumptions are being made.

I accept it is possible their intention to go after ERP adverts and got way too heavy handed, but evidence thus far I don't think backs this up, so I am not inclined to make this assumption (Occam's razor again)

Especially as I am not even 100% sure they count as a violation. Profanity refers to the language used and not what it is used to describe. You can write erotica without using profanities and no advertisements I've seen use profanity.