Well, this way, he doesn't get a temp ban. Otherwise, instead of gaol until he talks to GM, its a 3 day temp ban. Not sure how thats better.I ain't saying that the GM's decision is a bad one. I don't know the context of his ban.
What I'm against is the incessant witch hunting happening in this thread for a guy daring to critique a system he felt was unfair, and which I honestly can't say he lacks a point in. Having to wait in-game with no way to know when someone will check your ticket, instead of, say, a casual e-mail chain, and then not even getting a "okay so you called someone a dipsauce" for your troubles... eeeh, I can't say that's a good way to handle bans my hombre.
Just because a streamer abused his platform for a witch hunt doesn't mean SE should go full witness protection on our asses. If anything, the only thing this proves is that the streamer should be barred from ever playing the game again.
The system is flawed and bad. At its current stage of implementation, it's more worthwhile to ban the account outright and send them an e-mail because it achieves essentially the same goal.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.