Quote Originally Posted by Melichoir View Post
Id give some of this credit if it played out like this in the MSQ, but thats not how things go down.
Cute idea, it could have happened that way, it just simply didn't. Once again this is more of a 'You guys just don't accept it' kinda of deal, but Im not against the idea that it could have played out that way. My only counter idea, which is more of a loose guess because I have nothing more to go off of, Maybe the Males where just elsewhere in the Forest, possibly in parts we haven't explored. We dot know how big that Forest actually is.

Quote Originally Posted by Melichoir View Post
I kept using FFXIV as a broad point because ShB is built upon pre-existing norms and lore. It is the sum of all its lore, and how the inserted Viera lore from FFXII doesnt quite fit within what already existed. When you include ShB content too, it gets even more wonky. And my prediction is future content that deals with the Viera and their culture will make things more complicated and convoluted unless they address issues that exist because the FFXII lore doesnt fit with the FFXIV lore.
But do you not see the issue with your statement here when you Previously said "If no Male Viera on the Source because of Ivalice. Ok" But then when you keep talking about how the Viera stick out and its inconsistent you are in fact just talking about how they are the same on the 1st and why its bad. That is a separate world that has no baring on the Source. If you missed it I agree with you that its weird that the Viera are the same on the 1st, what Im now not getting is how their portrayal on the 1st effect them at all on the Source. Which is starting to sound like the next argument here since you insist on using FFXIV in a broad stroke even though you are just talking about one section that wouldn't have any effect on the narrative on the source.

Lol, so close to coming to an understand that could have stopped this.