
Originally Posted by
Tabbs
Ignoring the stereotyping, you're only half right. "Art imitates life" is only literal in that we use it as a point of reference or as self-expression. It is otherwise subjective and debatable. A lot of art, for example, is depictions of what we *want to see* rather than what life *actually is*. It would be more accurate to say, in your case, that "art imitates the ideal of life" or that "life imitates art" as Oscar Wilde put it. You're taking a phrase rooted in the culture and history of the arts and applying it to your opinion of how someone should look based on your associations with a couple of words.
If you observe art movements throughout history, you'll see that we go through periods of idealizing life and then artists subsequently rejecting that in favor of realism or personal expression. Look at Dadaism. It was a direct response from artists of the time to patrons and critics telling them what art is "supposed to be". That the people need to be beautiful, that the landscapes need to be lush. It was an *offense* to depict the common man at work at various points in history, but real life wasn't pretty or romantic. People weren't all sculpted athletes and models. Look up "The Gleaners" -- The rich French (patrons, the Salon, critics, etc.) hated it for depicting a reality they didn't want to face. These things still happen today, frequently (and especially in games/visdev settings).
But like Churro said, SE can and will do pretty much whatever they want. Yeah, male Viera will probably be marginally taller than the women with potential to be marginally shorter, that's just the track record they've set. But after that? Who knows my guy.
Anyways sorry for rambling in the middle there, I love talking about art lol.
TLDR: "Art imitates life" is a cliche and overused phrase that isn't even necessarily true when so much art is based on ideals. Also stereotypes bad ¯\_(ツ)_/¯