Quote Originally Posted by Kohl View Post
What is the likelihood that anything I have to say is going to open your eyes to the possibility of being wrong? I'd guess it is pretty low, though I would also guess that it is higher in order to save face that doesn't need saving. So, in light of my guess that nothing I say will matter to your opinion, what do you care if I find something to be both a bad idea and unethical, when the only reason I am stating it is to make my own stance succinctly clear. I have already made attempts to explain why.
About as likely as you opening your eyes to the possibility that you also may be wrong.

Quote Originally Posted by Kohl View Post
Genuine question: why do you feel that there should be limits to where human rights should be expressed? Why not have human rights everywhere there are humans?
Because it has nothing to do with human rights. A video game cannot harm someone or remove/limit their rights. If this were about a humans rights of expression then what about the developer's rights to their expression in not opening up gear to both genders? Or choosing anything that doesn't immediately get them labeled as "regressive"?