Quote Originally Posted by Krotoan View Post
That's projection and assumption. It is "in our nature" to desire acceptance. Whether this acceptance comes from ones self or ones peers will determine how "good" you need to look to go out. I know lots of people who merely shoot for "legal" when they leave the house. When you go to work you have to look clean because of company standards and you represent the company or are vying for positive attention, I actually have a job where I can wear next to whatever I want since I'm not visible and since my performance is purely metric measured I don't have to "dress to impress" to move up, I merely have to adhere to safety/legal standards and comfort. Again, the experience of being a human in today's world varies WILDLY.




I'd wager the venn diagram for "glamour purchaser" and "wouldn't use 'hide glamours' " overlaps pretty heavily. There would be loss of course, but as I said, the possibility for further expansion would increase. Truly it would take actually implementing both the option AND further glam options to prove either way but I don't see this customization option to be even a nail in the glam sales coffin. Theres still the emails, launcher adverts, and word of mouth on message boards.
Ok I am willing to project and assume this base off how big the beauty market is, and the normals I see growing up. I'm not saying that a case can't be made that some people don't care, but to tell me that MOST don't...eh...that would be a tough cookie to sell.