It's time (Option to Hide other players Glamour)

[Reinha]

Why stop at glamours? Maybe we could have an option to turn all Lalafells to either Viera or Hrothgar, client side.

[ElciaDeiLinus]

Why stop at glamours? Maybe we could have an option to turn all Lalafells to either Viera or Hrothgar, client side.

Why stop at a profanity filter, presence of one obviously means we'll be removing all speech next.

[Reinha]

Why stop at a profanity filter, presence of one obviously means we'll be removing all speech next.

Are you unaware you can already turn off chats in your chatbox?

[Theodric]

Are you unaware you can already turn off chats in your chatbox?

Chat was also removed from ranked PvP.

[SamRF]

Why stop at glamours? Maybe we could have an option to turn all Lalafells to either Viera or Hrothgar, client side.

What would be the problem with that? It's a client side voluntary option. I think that's the biggest argument from the people who either don't mind or do want this option. Hypothetically speaking you could completely mod the game and make every player look like penguins. What does it matter when someone does that? Would you ever notice? It's their client, it's their files on their computer. Only anti-choice argument I can understand is that implementation of this option would perhaps require resources that are best spent elsewhere.

[Sairys]

What would be the problem with that? It's a client side voluntary option. I think that's the biggest argument from the people who either don't mind or do want this option. Hypothetically speaking you could completely mod the game and make every player look like penguins. What does it matter when someone does that? Would you ever notice? It's their client, it's their files on their computer. Only anti-choice argument I can understand is that implementation of this option would perhaps require resources that are best spent elsewhere.

The difference between modding and what's requested is dev endorsement realistically. It's also really not a "perhaps require resources" it would require resources when people complain about content droughts.
If people mod the game that's completely separate from any decisions from the devs and doesn't really involve any time from them. The stance on mods from the devs though really goes counter to most of your post as the software package actually belongs to SE and they have ToS rules on what you're allowed to do with it that you agreed to when purchasing/subbing.

[SamRF]

The difference between modding and what's requested is dev endorsement realistically. It's also really not a "perhaps require resources" it would require resources when people complain about content droughts.
If people mod the game that's completely separate from any decisions from the devs and doesn't really involve any time from them. The stance on mods from the devs though really goes counter to most of your post as the software package actually belongs to SE and they have ToS rules on what you're allowed to do with it that you agreed to when purchasing/subbing.

Good point, I agree with your reasoning.