FFXIV named "worst FF ever" by IGN.

[Tonkra]

Well i personally think FF7 Dirge of Cerberus is the worst? ;X
although its not a real FF..


well and IGN hasnt played FFXIV since when? ;D and i dont care because ign does only care for games which fit the mass-market.
i like FF14 more than FF13 because i totally dislike the linearity, cutscenes over cutscnes... so and now?
its true FFXIV is far away from completion and perfectivity... but no need to flame on a game that is trying to turn around.



seems to me like they dont follow the development of the game, which is kind of unfair.



just my opinion.

[Krausus]

Well i personally think FF7 Dirge of Cerberus is the worst? ;X
although its not a real FF..


well and IGN hasnt played FFXIV since when? ;D and i dont care because ign does only care for games which fit the mass-market.
i like FF14 more than FF13 because i totally dislike the linearity, cutscenes over cutscnes... so and now?
its true FFXIV is far away from completion and perfectivity... but no need to flame on a game that is trying to turn around.



seems to me like they dont follow the development of the game, which is kind of unfair.



just my opinion.

hehe if we are counting all FF titles then I would have to say Mystic Quest was the worst.

[Zantetsuken]

hehe if we are counting all FF titles then I would have to say Mystic Quest was the worst.

Wow.

You went THERE.

MQ is the" Wand of Gamelon" of the FF series.

[Firesped]

Well i personally think FF7 Dirge of Cerberus is the worst? ;X
although its not a real FF..


well and IGN hasnt played FFXIV since when? ;D and i dont care because ign does only care for games which fit the mass-market.
i like FF14 more than FF13 because i totally dislike the linearity, cutscenes over cutscnes... so and now?
its true FFXIV is far away from completion and perfectivity... but no need to flame on a game that is trying to turn around.



seems to me like they dont follow the development of the game, which is kind of unfair.



just my opinion.

I think FF7: Dirge of Cerberus would have been 100% better had they released the FPSMMO to the English side instead of killing it the day before US release of the game. I got the Japanese version of the game but I was not able to do much for the FPSMMO because of my only partial understanding of the language. It did think it would have made SE a ton of money had they released it in the states. And in that I agree it makes it the worst FF title.

I was looking at their comments over at IGN and a lot go back in forth on FFVIII, I played the Japanese version and almost beat it before US release. I didn't like the US release because some of the feel of the side characters were lost in translation. Namely Zell. He was using damn it almost every line of text in the Japanese version. the US release did have an upgraded draw system though that made the game easier.

I feel it is poor sport of IGN to slander this game. To imply it is the weakest and "...and one you should probably avoid." (taken from the title of the article) hurts us and this game. How can anyone judge this game when you have not played entirely through the game. The game isn't entirely released yet, even from a 1.0 standpoint. It would have been best for IGN to not mention 14 at all.

For me, FFXI will always be highly treasured for a number of reasons. The first being that I got to play my "own" character through the story, not some other character. Second, I also feel that the story itself was far more epic (I beat everything but WotG at 75 far before Abyssea) and larger then any other FF game has been. #3, my friends have seen me play it on my computer and say the game looks awesome. It for more or less is a PS2 game.

I actually hold high hopes for FFXIV to surpass FFXI in greatness.