Recent Developments of TOS Actions Taken

[Vnolan]

Not going to comment on the rest of your post, but this is particularly bad on SE’s part to do (really, this extends to any company with terms of service).

How? Are they going to lose subs as a result?

They have been repeatedly condemned on various platforms by a multitude of individuals in the past for their inconsistency with rule enforcement and punishment in this game (be it in-game enforcement or enforcement on official platforms such as these forums).

How many players have canceled their sub because SE does not enforce their ToS? The argument could be made they get more subs from allowing players to use bots and sell content for money.

Continuing to build their moderation on this cherry-picking mentality by now taking into account third-party evidence only when it’s suddenly convenient to do so—or only when they want to—is only going to be detrimental to them.

Only if they were to go after parsing, which they won't given how many use it and the current rules around it.

While this may be their playground, arbitrary and/or inconsistent rule enforcement is never met with positive reactions from people in the playground.

Doesn't mean anything if they stay subbed.

And it honestly should not be a mentality anyone enforces. I’d rather see people advocating for fairer and more consistent moderation as opposed to supporting this. Again, this goes for any company; not just SE.

They should start banning for use of hunt radar, triggers, visual mods that provide combat advantages, automated waymark placement and account piloting? What about uploading logs? You can't argue it falls into what's allowed regarding parsing. That's a lot of people to ban.

On the side note this opens a really nasty doors for potential future abusements.

How are trolls going to tie it to the owner's official streaming account?