after they added male miqote and female roegadyn they did say that they heavily dislike the idea of genderlocked races and were against it hence why they removed itAt no point did SE promise to not do "sex segregated races" nor was it ever implied that way. I keep seeing this a lot, but no one can show any artical or media confirming this statement. I have nothing against adding male viera, but people should usr facts, not assumption in their argument against why SE didnt impliment male viera.
Didn't think I'd get to ask you again for that source (though I think at the time you said they promised they wouldn't do it again).
Nah they removed the genderlocks cuz they loved the genderlocks but they just got high and decided its best to remove it. The only source you need here is logic xD
If the only source you have is "logic," then that just tells me that players have been putting words in the XIV dev teams mouth from the get go and have been spreading misinformation.
Logically they could have not made Hrothgar because Viera are popular for some reason, yet here we are (and I'm glad Hrothgar exist).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.