Quote Originally Posted by RoyalBeef View Post
Of course I do, and everyone who says they never done it is either a liar, or hasnt unlocked SB alliance raids yet :P Nice try making it look like I'm engaging in some kind of forbidden or unethical activity tho xD Go ahead, name and shame me for avoiding Orbonne Abandon Roulette, I can take it ^^
I've never done that because I accept that queuing for a roulette means I'm fine with running any content that roulette can put me in at my level. I get the reward for running the roulette because I'm willing to participate in the content I'm thrown in at random - and thats pretty obviously the way it was intended to be.

The easiest fix for the moment would probably be to remove the ilvl-requirements for the 24-man-raids from the past expansions. If people can end up in Holminster with an ilvl of 290, they can do Orbonne with that ilvl. Once they found a way to fix ilvls for leveling roulette, they can apply the same fix to the alliance roulette to make sure you can only queue for it if you have the appropriate level and ilvl (=the ilvl required for the highste possible raid) for it.
Right now its not working as intended and we shouldnt promote such abusive of the system, for our own sake. Arent we all annoyed by people not being able to execute simple mechanics? Arent we all complaining about the lack of a proper learning curve from dungeon to trial to NM raid to Ex-primal to Savage? Neither Labyrinth nor Syrcus Tower give people the chance to learn how to handle mechanics. HW and SB raids would have a better shot at that - but of course its best to avoid those and then end up surprised when people fail the trials in your trial roulette...