It's time to remove job restrictions on glamour...

[snarkomatic]

Or some people recognize waste of dev resources that could be used elsewhere.

Isn't that really something for the devs to decide, though? Not armchair forum warriors? And most of the arguments here have been for other reasons (e.g., immersion) anyway.

[SendohJin]

Isn't that really something for the devs to decide, though? Not armchair forum warriors? And most of the arguments here have been for other reasons (e.g., immersion) anyway.

How is that not every topic? It's easy to say what the devs want is to leave things alone unless they already have plans to change it.

If the people who are clamoring for it are supplying money for your paycheck is it really a waste? Without players SE is nothing they depend on us to buy their games and sub. If enough people don't do that then its kiss the frog and move on. So if its something enough of the player base wants then they will probably get it. If i recall correctly housing and glamours were not part of the original design either and yet here they are.

Yes, but there's no data to show a lot of people care for complete and total removal of glamour restrictions.

[Bright-Flower]

Isn't that really something for the devs to decide, though? Not armchair forum warriors? And most of the arguments here have been for other reasons (e.g., immersion) anyway.

And honestly, only the devs know how much time it would take to do.

People asking for things don't know how long it would take, and it could be a bigger deal than they imagine.

People against it could also overestimate how much work it would take.

We can only really guess at it.