You're probably talking about the child thing. Which is worst, sexualizing adults or sexualizing minors?
I'm placing my money on Yoshi-P talking about how cool Warrior is for forty minutes, again. I remember the last live letter before Stormblood.
I think they might be nerfing WAR I remember at Fanfest Q/A someone was complaining about crafted accessories being stronger cause of penta melds and asking for tome/raid accessories to be stronger and Yoshi P was all “actually we think WAR is too strong currently”.
younger appearances 8snt the same as sexualizing lol are do you go around sexualizing our loli race if you do get help.
a character being younger or appearing younger will not lead to sexualizing the character what fool thinks that is true should go look at hello kitty or wows goblins and gnones
It’s actually a very true and valid concernyounger appearances 8snt the same as sexualizing lol are do you go around sexualizing our loli race if you do get help.
a character being younger or appearing younger will not lead to sexualizing the character what fool thinks that is true should go look at hello kitty or wows goblins and gnones
Er... yes it will.younger appearances 8snt the same as sexualizing lol are do you go around sexualizing our loli race if you do get help.
a character being younger or appearing younger will not lead to sexualizing the character what fool thinks that is true should go look at hello kitty or wows goblins and gnones
It'll only take one person to equip their child character with a bikini and do the squat emote and FFXIV would be shut down by censors.
Don't respond to Morbol, we had that discussion in another thread and it resulted in posts that contained very questionable opinions that the Mods then mass-deleted.
For my predictions, I'd say Benchmark, Job Action Trailer, and Yoshi-P running around a map with a FATE he won't be allowed to do. Just like last time.
I'm taking Lore way too seriously. And I'm not sorry about that.
The UN's been trying repeatedly to make loli stuff illegal globally, going so far as to threaten Japan if they didn't crack down on it themselves, and every social media site under the sun has been taking extreme stances on it(Reddit, as an example, will ban people for non-erotic pictures of male characters that are 19). "We don't want to deal with the backlash because people will lose their minds if we add Alisaie and Alphinaud's body types" isn't a response I can exactly blame Square for taking.younger appearances 8snt the same as sexualizing lol are do you go around sexualizing our loli race if you do get help.
a character being younger or appearing younger will not lead to sexualizing the character what fool thinks that is true should go look at hello kitty or wows goblins and gnones
You make good sense and I'd like to agree with you, but as a counter-point? I can't see us getting benchmark until the media tour embargo drops. Which is about the 29th, if I recall.Don't respond to Morbol, we had that discussion in another thread and it resulted in posts that contained very questionable opinions that the Mods then mass-deleted.
For my predictions, I'd say Benchmark, Job Action Trailer, and Yoshi-P running around a map with a FATE he won't be allowed to do. Just like last time.
Whatever happens I hope they don't ruin RDM, please do not Nerf our ability to dualcast raise, I have saved many runs in content from being a group wide wipe and have been saved in content by RDM dualcast raise.
Rez Mage is a badge of honor I wear and one of my favorite things about the job is it's dualcast raises.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.