Quote Originally Posted by Gemina View Post
However, it still leans towards the realm of science because the universe does exist.
That sentence makes no logical sense. Something doesn't become scientific just because it talks about something that exists. Science has to meet certain criteria such as being evidence based, repeatable and falsifiable. Astrology is none of those. You can believe whatever the heck you want about planets and gods and stuff, but there is nothing scientific whatsoever about astrology. This is the only thing I'm harping on, since trying to even claim it is adjacent to a science is complete bunk. The phrase you're looking for instead of "leans towards the realm of science" is pseudo-science. Please use that phrase instead of trying to lend some sort of scientific legitimacy to astrology.

You can say whatever you want about how religion relates to astrology since astrology is commonly associated with and linked with modern religions despite not being a religion in and of itself, and religion honestly doesn't matter to me in the slightest.