Page 12 of 16 FirstFirst ... 2 10 11 12 13 14 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 158

Thread: Mark of Tanaka

  1. #111
    Player

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Ulda'h
    Posts
    122
    What gets me is that they still just don't get it at all. Saying that a need or greed system is comming is great, but then making it take 20 nutcharms for a mog weapon in the meantime is just Silly. The new team had that choice in their hands and they are playing the same stupid old games that they always have in the past. These people really are clueless. Also one memeber of my ls that i have beat the mog with 20 times has 5 weapons and have gotten the bow 3 times already. How they let that happen again when people were so upset about it b-4 is beyond me. Sometimes I think a 12 year old could design better systems in a game.
    (7)

  2. #112
    Player
    Cerseii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    26
    Character
    Cersei Myrcei
    World
    Ridill
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 50
    The key is to have a committee designing a game...
    Tanaka + Yoshi and some others would be epic.
    (4)

  3. #113
    Player
    captainpicard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    297
    Character
    Captain Picard
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Goldsmith Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Orcishgrappler View Post
    What gets me is that they still just don't get it at all. Saying that a need or greed system is comming is great, but then making it take 20 nutcharms for a mog weapon in the meantime is just Silly. The new team had that choice in their hands and they are playing the same stupid old games that they always have in the past. These people really are clueless. Also one memeber of my ls that i have beat the mog with 20 times has 5 weapons and have gotten the bow 3 times already. How they let that happen again when people were so upset about it b-4 is beyond me. Sometimes I think a 12 year old could design better systems in a game.
    It is for the reason that I have grave concern about 2.0. "Being in beta" is not an excuse for these types of maneuvers, when you are paying monthly to play. Its just bad design through and through, with AMPLE feedback to indicate otherwise prior to implementation of this.

    It says "We don't get it" loud and clear
    (7)

    blocked: prettyprincess, betelgeuzah, jennestia

  4. #114
    Player

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by Orcishgrappler View Post
    What gets me is that they still just don't get it at all. Saying that a need or greed system is comming is great, but then making it take 20 nutcharms for a mog weapon in the meantime is just Silly. The new team had that choice in their hands and they are playing the same stupid old games that they always have in the past. These people really are clueless. Also one memeber of my ls that i have beat the mog with 20 times has 5 weapons and have gotten the bow 3 times already. How they let that happen again when people were so upset about it b-4 is beyond me. Sometimes I think a 12 year old could design better systems in a game.


    They do get it, and they've made tons of changes to this game. So many that they have decided to remap the game to continue to create content and retool the game. However, they have to sift through tons of problems from launch and deal with time constraints and multitask projects. This game needs tons of patches but to complain that someone has done five runs and gotten 3 of the same item is epic. I bet they also complain in Vegas that they keep losing at slot machines.
    (0)
    Daran Gestahl - Hyperion

  5. #115
    Player
    Mireille's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    319
    Character
    Mireille Celestine
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Cerseii View Post
    The key is to have a committee designing a game...
    Tanaka + Yoshi and some others would be epic.
    Tanaka created a lot of content in XI, so it would be hard to say that he wasn't responsible for its success with the players. It's funny but now that he is back in XI he is being blamed for killing the very content, Abyssea, that drove so many of its die hard players away. I'd like to see Tanaka develop content for hard core players in XIV. I think he would come up with some great stuff.

    I'm not sure I agree completely with Yoshida-san's idea that hard core players are defined by being the first to complete something even though they usually are. I think its more a question of hard core players complete things early in their life-cycle when the content hasn't been figured out or dumbed down to make it accessible. Hard core players are more defined by their desire to face extreme challenges, and being number one out the gate is a secondary consideration.

    In XI the events were very challenging, and required leadership skills on the part of the organizers as well as dedication on the part of the participants. Those of you would showed up at every sky/dyna/limbus/salvage your linkshells did know what I mean. Yes we all complained bitterly about the drop rates and kept showing up anyways. I really would like to see events like that in XIV, and if it takes Tanaka to do them then bring him. I'm not suggesting removing Yoshi-P as producer. He's done a great job, and he will continue to do a great job, but his theme park needs more than one vision when it comes to designing the rides.
    (3)
    Last edited by Mireille; 12-27-2011 at 11:48 AM. Reason: Grammar fix

  6. #116
    Player

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Uldah
    Posts
    426
    Quote Originally Posted by Mireille View Post
    I'm not sure I agree completely with the Yoshida-san's idea that hard core players are defined by being the first to complete sometime even though they usually are. I think its more a question of hard core players complete things early in their life-cycle when the content hasn't been figured out or dumbed down to make it accessible. Hard core players are more defined by their desire to face extreme challenges, and being number one out the gate is a secondary consideration.
    To be fair to not-so-casual-or-hardcore players like me, I define hardcore players not only those who are willing to play this same game every day for hours on end, but also those who are willing to deal with bad game design decisions and overcome or get around them. What you call "dumbing down" (which IMO is a very bad misnomer) is my "fixing it to what it should've been". Remember the early days of FFXIV with the way SP worked? Then eventually they fixed that to make it so it's per kill. I hardly think that's considered a "dumbing down" of a mechanic, but rather a very bad game design decision that was fixed to be more in line with what other games NORMALLY do.

    And to be fair, I think it's the other way around - their number one is to be the one "out the gate" and "do it first (and try to make it look good in the process)" - this is pretty evident with the way posts appear after stuff like Primal fights were introduced. After they get it out the door, they then learn how to take that extreme challenge and optimize it to make it better and more "efficient" for themselves. The good guys share that knowledge with the rest of the community (stand on the shoulders of giants) while the selfish ones keep it to themselves.

    Another case in point for me is the crafting mechanic - after I realize within the first few months that the crafting system is one of the most inaccessible parts of the game (in terms of time spent vs reward/me not falling asleep), I gave up on it after a few months. I come back several months later and 1.19 completely fixes it up to a point where it makes sense and IMO is sane. Everyone who endured crafting and manage to get SEVERAL crafters to 50 before the 1.19 "dumbing down" are those who I consider "hardcore" (or dedicated), because they were willing to put up with the system, despite its flaws, and get to 50 regardless.

    But yeah, like Orcishgrappler says, I think the dev team sometimes seems to "forget" why FFXIV was panned worldwide by critics. That's what we're here for, to remind the team that if they do make these bad game design decisions, they will simply run the risk of pulling another XIV launch fiasco when 2.0 comes out. I'm sure they're aware, but I think like I said in many posts before, we need to keep reminding them to avoid such decisions. Making the game extremely "hard" will make your hardcore base happy, but it's going to piss everyone else off - casuals and some-where-in-the-middle and most importantly new subscribers who came from possibly other games alike. But at the same time I think there's plenty of room for everyone, no one should be excluded, and I think Square has the resources and the budget to be able to do this.

    Because of these occasional bad design decisions by Yoshida's team that are reminiscent of launch date XIV, I've pretty much given up trying to put "labels" on some of these things. Thanks to the (might I say rather civilized) discussion in this thread, instead of calling one of Yoshida's bad game design decisions "Tanaka-like", I think I'll just call it what it is - a bad game design decision. Period - that they did. Neither producer is better than the other, and at this point I don't care who's at the helm. They just need to make sure the current and new game they produce are accessible by all types of players and not just one or other exclusive group.
    (2)
    Proud member of the "why the the heck are giant obnoxious images allowed in signatures" club.

    Quote Originally Posted by kensredemption
    I'd rather play solo than play with a bunch of elitists.

  7. #117
    Player
    Mireille's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    319
    Character
    Mireille Celestine
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Bahn View Post
    To be fair to not-so-casual-or-hardcore players like me, I define hardcore players not only those who are willing to play this same game every day for hours on end, but also those who are willing to deal with bad game design decisions and overcome or get around them. What you call "dumbing down" (which IMO is a very bad misnomer) is my "fixing it to what it should've been".
    You're making assumptions about what I mean by dumbing down. A craft system where you have to get weaver to level 35 to do leatherworking leve, and you have to get leatherworker to 35 in order to do weaver leve is broken. A system where you need 6 different trainings that can't be gotten till level 20+ in order to make level 1 items is broken. I got crafts to 50 before 1.19, and I still do leve post 1.19. I still see a lot of room for improvement in crafting, but most of what they have done and are talking about doing really is a fix.

    Back in FF XI giving people an experience points reward for helping others with the Chains of Promathia Missions in order to encourage people to redo really challenging fights is a fix. Removing the level cap is dumbing it down. I remember the first time I set foot in Lufaise meadows because it was so hard getting there. I beat airship and Tenzen when they had a cap and that was exhilarating. Everyone had to know their job and do it well to beat those fights. Now a single 99 samurai can destroy Tenzen for the remaining 5 people in the party while they stand around watching and get them access to Sea. That's what I call dumbing it down. I'm all in favor of them making it so you don't get randomly wiped by passing easy prey mobs while doing the moogle NMs, but I am totally against them removing the walk, the spiggans, the linking, or the 5 fights themselves. Yes a lot of people don't agree with me on that but navigating a maze while abiding by certain rules is what makes the quest a game. Running to a ??? before you redo the fight is at best a time sink. The people you see standing nekkid clutching a moogle weapon at the entrance to Ul'dah aren't that proud without reason.

    Making all the content for casual play would be as much a mistake as making it all for the hard core player. They game needs a mix to succeed. That and the fact that Tanaka is very good at making that type of content is my point.

    There are plenty of people who would happily to ride a helicopter to the top of Mt. Everest so they can enjoy the view, and then there are people who want to make the climb because that's where the real accomplishment and bragging rights lie. I'm sure mountaineers would cringe at the analogy, but hardcore players are the same way for the most part. Honestly I don't mind not being the first to get something, but please don't make it a walk in the park or its no longer going to be fun.

    BTW if Orcishgrapper is the same person who used to play XI on Carbuncle tell him Hi from Mireille, and ask him to say hi to Pandorous for me. I miss that little guy
    (0)
    Last edited by Mireille; 12-27-2011 at 11:01 AM. Reason: Added sentence unrelated to topic at end.

  8. #118
    Player
    Lienn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,949
    Character
    Lienn Deleene
    World
    Gungnir
    Main Class
    Alchemist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Mireille View Post
    Tanaka created a lot of content in XI, so it would be hard to say that he wasn't responsible for its success with the players. It's funny but now that he is back in XI he is being blamed for killing the very content, Abyssea, that drove so many of its die hard players away. I'd like to see Tanaka develop content for hard core players in XIV. I think he would come up with some great stuff.

    I'm not sure I agree completely with Yoshida-san's idea that hard core players are defined by being the first to complete something even though they usually are. I think its more a question of hard core players complete things early in their life-cycle when the content hasn't been figured out or dumbed down to make it accessible. Hard core players are more defined by their desire to face extreme challenges, and being number one out the gate is a secondary consideration.

    In XI the events were very challenging, and required leadership skills on the part of the organizers as well as dedication on the part of the participants. Those of you would showed up at every sky/dyna/limbus/salvage your linkshells did know what I mean. Yes we all complained bitterly about the drop rates and kept showing up anyways. I really would like to see events like that in XIV, and if it takes Tanaka to do them then bring him. I'm not suggesting removing Yoshi-P as producer. He's done a great job, and he will continue to do a great job, but his theme park needs more than one vision when it comes to designing the rides.
    I agree. But, in respect for Yoshida (and 2.0) i would rather seeing what Tanaka had planned to FFXIV as another game.

    I believe that now that they decided the 2.0 is "the FFXIV" then it would be a desmoralization to Yoshida having Tanaka back in charge, even if co-ed...would be like "Hey...we gave you his position but after an year we noticed it was a mistake so the old director is back."...and this would be bad to both Yoshida, that would be labeled as incompetent, and SE itself since this kind of decision would reflect lack of vision of who decided this.

    This is why i support the original FFXIV making a return as a spin-off game. It would protect Yoshida and SE and would also reflect the respect SE has for both Tanaka and the players who liked the orriginal FFXIV but didn't like the way the current FFXIV is going...after all they already are different games and when maps change the only similarities between them would be the very same between FFXI and FFXIV...some models.
    (0)

  9. #119
    Player
    Mireille's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    319
    Character
    Mireille Celestine
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Lienn View Post
    I believe that now that they decided the 2.0 is "the FFXIV" then it would be a desmoralization to Yoshida having Tanaka back in charge, even if co-ed...
    I'm not suggesting that at all. I'm suggesting that having Tanaka-san develop content like HNM, Dungeons, etc... would result in some great content for the game. I don't think it would be backtracking for SE either. He is already VP in charge of software development, so its not exactly a leap for him to directly involve himself in the project.
    (0)

  10. #120
    Player

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Uldah
    Posts
    889
    Errr all tanaka can ever create is mobs with overpowered AoE and crap drop rates. Let's leave him out of this game as much as possible.
    (2)
    Rarely Plays
    See your face upon the clear water. How dirty! Come! Wash your face!
    loltanaka: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOOw2yWMSfk

Page 12 of 16 FirstFirst ... 2 10 11 12 13 14 ... LastLast