I mean obviously they wouldn't be, but it's plain that this was meant to give people a new option for a beastial race that we've never really had before, while at the same time kind of appeasing people that persistently asked for viera.What's funny to me is that I'm not at all convinced that Hrothgar would be a more popular choice than Viera male.
They did the same thing with Miqo'te back in 1.0, genderlocking the race and instead giving us male-only Highlanders and Roegadyn. Now look at the playerbase, with Miqomales played far more than males of both previously male-only races.
If I were a betting man I'd throw my coin in with Viera male being the more popular pick every time.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.