Gendered flower crowns? Really?

[PyurBlue]

I knew something like this would happen. Anyone and their mother will find anything to complain about. If you aren't happy with the item, throw it in your armoire never to see the sun again. You can still use flower corsages if you're seriously that upset over it. Plenty to choose from.~

It's a legitimate complaint. There being two gender locked versions isn't the end of the world, but when we have to live with limited dev resources to create glam items, why restrict us further for no reason? Two models had to be made, and unlike items that are worn on the body it doesn't seem like it would take much work adapt an item to different body types.

[Lukha]

Wow, for once a gendered item where I actually like the male version better. I don't really I understand why they had to be different between genders in the first place, though, rather than just two different items to choose from? I don't agree that the choice is baffling, since it's honestly just par for the course for this team by now, but it's certainly stupid.

I'm also salty that they went with a daisy crown instead of peach blossoms to match the previous Little Ladies Day accessories... it's been years, how long do I have to wait for a matching set?

[Dualgunner]

I knew something like this would happen. Anyone and their mother will find anything to complain about. If you aren't happy with the item, throw it in your armoire never to see the sun again. You can still use flower corsages if you're seriously that upset over it. Plenty to choose from.~

Incoming "It doesn't bother me therefore it's not worth criticizing" posts.

[Skeith9]

I find this kind of funny. Not only is it gendered, but the MALE version is better. I really want to know what the dev conversation was like to decide that.

[Breezelyn]

It's a legitimate complaint. There being two gender locked versions isn't the end of the world, but when we have to live with limited dev resources to create glam items, why restrict us further for no reason? Two models had to be made, and unlike items that are worn on the body it doesn't seem like it would take much work adapt an item to different body types.

You have a point, yes. I just think it's something to not heavily worry about, but that's just how I feel. Don't take it too seriously. I just doubt it's going to change anytime soon with 5.0 a few months off.

Incoming "It doesn't bother me therefore it's not worth criticizing" posts.

Just stating my views, what's wrong with that? ;D

[LalaRu]

After all the countless venting threads about female gear being much better than male, now we have male gear better than female's. And disappointed people shows up.

When female version of gear is better, people are disappointed about males left behind.

When gear is neutral, people is disappointed because gear is "bland and without any uniqueness"

"you can't make everyone happy" saying cannot be more true than ever.

[Dualgunner]

Just stating my views, what's wrong with that? ;D

Same /10char

[Brynne]

"you can't make everyone happy" saying cannot be more true than ever.

True, but... in this case they could've made two different flower crown items with the different models and everyone could have both, and this thread wouldn't exist. They did it for the ghost costumes in that one Halloween event, so why not here?

[Izanagi_Fiaresu]

Personally I think they should equally represent all 32 genders.

[Aivi_lo]

I wish they would just give everybody both, or use the visor option to switch between them