Regarding the Revision of the Prohibited Activities and Account Penalty Policy

[HyoMinPark]

The way for determining a "reasonable person" is not based on culture. It's commonly used by lawyers. You're interpreting "reasonable person" incorrectly which is why you believe the rules are too vague, need a cultural distinction, or must be expounded upon.

"The reasonable person belongs to a family of hypothetical figures in law including: the "right-thinking member of society," the "officious bystander," the "reasonable parent," the "reasonable landlord," the "fair-minded and informed observer," the "person having ordinary skill in the art" in patent law, and stretching back to Roman jurists, the figure of the bonus paterfamilias,[1] all used to define legal standards. While there is a loose consensus in black letter law, there is no accepted technical definition. As with legal fiction in general, it is somewhat susceptible to ad hoc manipulation or transformation, and hence the "reasonable person" is an emergent concept of common law.[3] The "reasonable person" is used as a tool to standardize, teach law students, or explain the law to a jury.[2]"

If you notice the guideline about “contravening public order or morals”, there is no “reasonable person” definition applied there. As that is what is being discussed in my post, your point is completely irrelevant.

This is the only time that terminology is used:

Expressions that any reasonable person would find offensive

Nowhere else:

◆Offensive expression
"Offensive expression" means an expression in general that inflicts emotional distress by being offensive to another person. Offensive expression may include:

・Aggressive expressions such as violent language/slander/insult/threat.
・Expressions that provoke or belittle another person, such as excessive criticism, negation/ridicule
・Expressions that significantly lack consideration for another person
・Expressions that unilaterally reject another person's opinion
・Expressions that any reasonable person would find offensive
・Expressions that compel a playing style
・Expressions that attempt to unilaterally exclude someone from the game or content/community, etc.
(Except when in accordance with rules set by an administrator such as a Free Company Master)
・Expressions that contravene public order and morals
・Other expressions that are offensive to another person

That being said, laws vary by country. I don’t think they’re all written with the same “universal” terminology. For all we know, there may be countries out there that don’t have legal definitions of “reasonable person”. But that definition is completely irrelevant here since it is written to only explicitly apply to that one guideline. Please pay attention to the context of what you are responding to before you formulate a response.