Regarding the Revision of the Prohibited Activities and Account Penalty Policy

[HyoMinPark]

・Expressions that unilaterally reject another person's opinion - Some people don't understand what "unilateral" means. It means to decide/order yourself without any consultation. In other words, being a dictator.

I don’t think it’s easy to apply “dictator” to opinions. Actions, sure. But opinions are less concrete. I can’t force my opinions on other people, nor can they on me. But you also cannot force me to agree with an opinion or not share my own. The wording suggests that it leans towards one person rejecting an opinion—e.g., not accepting it as valid. You can’t make humans accept an opinion as valid.

Who am I supposed to “consult” for my own opinions?

・Expressions that compel a playing style - Here, many people don't understand the word "compel". It means "to force". You can still suggests ways for someone to improve their playstyle. You just can't FORCE them to.

That doesn’t matter if the person claims they “feel” forced. You can tell someone to AOE, but you cannot physically move their fingers to the AOE buttons—that would be “forcing them”. But anyone can claim “they were trying to force me to adhere to this when they told me to do it”. They already do that.

・Expressions that attempt to unilaterally exclude someone from the game or content/community, etc.
(Except when in accordance with rules set by an administrator such as a Free Company Master) - Pretty specific and self-explanatory

As long as this doesn’t apply to Party Finders, I don’t have objections really. I should be allowed to exclude from my PFs based on criteria I set forth in the description.

・Expressions that contravene public order and morals - Again, common sense.

I don’t think this one is so cut-and-dry that “common sense” covers it entirely. What are the “morals” we are all set to follow? Each culture has its own subset of morals, so whose are we adhering to?

I use reason and logic, so I know what is reasonable and logical.

I don’t think that your personal definition of how you are “reasonable and logical” can apply to everyone else. That’s narrow-sighted to think that everyone will use the same reason and logic that you do. There can be de facto things that are considered reasonable, but there are other things that I would consider “reasonable” that other players may not.