Quote Originally Posted by Kaedan View Post
If you'd like, I can show you that they are pretty specific and easy to understand:

・Aggressive expressions such as violent language/slander/insult/threat. - Specific and self-explanatory
・Expressions that provoke or belittle another person, such as excessive criticism, negation/ridicule - Specific and self-explanatory
・Expressions that significantly lack consideration for another person - While no examples are given, this is common sense.
・Expressions that unilaterally reject another person's opinion - Some people don't understand what "unilateral" means. It means to decide/order yourself without any consultation. In other words, being a dictator.
・Expressions that any reasonable person would find offensive - Again, common sense. Golden rule applies here (if you wouldn't want something said you to, don't say it to someone else)
・Expressions that compel a playing style - Here, many people don't understand the word "compel". It means "to force". You can still suggests ways for someone to improve their playstyle. You just can't FORCE them to.
・Expressions that attempt to unilaterally exclude someone from the game or content/community, etc.
(Except when in accordance with rules set by an administrator such as a Free Company Master) - Pretty specific and self-explanatory
・Expressions that contravene public order and morals - Again, common sense.
・Other expressions that are offensive to another person - This is the only somewhat vague listing, but still far from confusing. Again, Golden Rule applies.
Amazing how you can't even come up with specific examples and only parrot alongside the terms.

How come excessive criticism is self-explanatory?
How come lack of consideration for another person is common sense?
How come expressions that any reasonable person would find offensive is common sense and you use the gold rule? I tolerate everything, so that means the term doesn't apply to me, right?

I'm honestly amazed how you consider "expressions that are offensive to another person" only slightly vague.