Quote Originally Posted by Kazhim View Post
Hell no, Lord of the ring, is really better, and built his myth and background on very very large period, also i never saw Gondor or Rohan as a remake of middle age in europe, but a merge of many inspiration and cultur with a very strong identity. Tell me is there archi bishop in gondor? Do you see any crusade or inquisitor stuff in lord of the ring? Is gandalf look like Merlin?
No no no and no.
So dont compare two tales who has definitely not the same level of writting and deep.

For what i saw from Ishgard and only on basic game that i finish the story : Ishgard has no use, no interest, and his inspiration too much close from england and france make it very common and déjà vu. Ishgard is just useless, has no major role, and has less identity than other kingdom in the game.
Else we have the right to phrase criticisme, i gave some argument no? SO accept it or let this topic away, we can not be agree always, but still i have right to spell what is wrong for me.
Analogy is lost on you isn't it? You do realize analogy isn't /comparison/ right? Not even close to being comparison in any way at that?
You've also only saw one area of like six. S I X. Along with what amounts to four hours of story focused on Ishgard versus well over forty the game actually has waiting for you. Just play the game. No one cares that you dislike Ishgard, but on a public forum we very much have the right to point out you're making uninformed criticisms. If you come out of the end of Heavensward with the same opinion good! I still hate most of the ARR story in spite of having completed it several times and I'll hold that opinion for a very long time. That opinion however came from actually experiencing it. Not playing 4D chess against myself based on story speculations that if you actually played, you'd see aren't true. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯