Quote Originally Posted by Gallus View Post
?




I'm expressing an opinion. I don't feel like I'm the one that can't handle a conversation with a discrepancy of opinions here. I haven't called you funny names or anything while you are resorting repeteadly to attacks and sarcastic remarks.





I'm generalizing harassment and bad manners as much as you are generalizing the other side's sensitivity and refusal to learn.
Has it occurred to you that this still completely invalidates your argument? You just admitted you're generalizing. You have no proof of anything.

This whole train of thought is a hot mess. I can't even understand how someone can come to these conclusions.

The very idea that the same comment can be considered harrassment based on the recipients history of being told that thing is asinine. This means that the first time a WHM is told 'heals?' it isn't harrassment but the fifth time it is? That is the most convoluted and potentially problematic thing I've read in quite a while.

Are you even sure you understand what the word harrassment means? It certainly doesn't seem like it to an outside observer. There is no situation in which 'heals?' is harrassment, least of all the one used as an example by Bourne.

I think you need to take a step back and think this through. Under your logic people could be reported for harrassment for basically saying anything about gameplay at all. It's insane.